Open Access Subscription AccessTotal views : 192
Motivational Factors for Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories and their Awareness of Open Access Publishing
The main objective of the study was to examine the perceptions and attitudes towards Institutional Repositories (IR) and open access publishing among the faculty members in the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Survey method was adapted and a questionnaire was distributed among all permanent academics in the Faculty of Arts, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. The results revealed that only 40% of the respondents were aware of open access publishing and nearly 15% of them had never heard of "open access". These results gave an insight that majority of the respondents are not familiar with 'open access'. The results further revealed that 15% of the respondents learnt about institutional repositories through web search engine while 13% learnt from information provided at faculty or meeting held in the university and by working in subject based archives. Only 44% of the respondents were aware of the university digital repository and 47% mentioned that they were not aware of it. The interesting finding is that 55% of the respondents reported their willingness to contribute to the university digital repository in future while 18% of them were not willing to contribute. Most of the respondents contributed to IR because they support the principle of open access and the major barrier to contribute to IR is fear of plagiarism.
Faculty Awareness, Institutional Repositories, Open Access, Motivational Factors
- Crow, Raym (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper, Washington DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm%7Edoc/ir_final_release_102.pdf accessed on 02/06/2016.
- Gibbons, S. (2004). Establishing an Institutional Repository. Library Technology Report, 40. 4:11-14.
- Lawal, I. (2002). Scholarly Communication: The use and Non-use of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 36. Retrieved from: http://www.istl.org/02fall/article3.html accessed on 11/12/2016.
- Lynch, C. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age, ARL Bimonthly Report 226. Accessed on: 10/10/2015. Retrieved from: www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html.
- Mackie, M (2004). Filling Institutional Repositories: Practical strategies from the DAEDALUS Project, Ariadne, 39. Accessed on: 28/02/2017. Retrieved from: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue39/mackie/.
- Pelizzari, E. (2004). Academic Authors and Open Archives: A Survey in the Social Science Field. Libri, 54: 113−22. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2004.113.
- Pickton, MJ. (2005). Research Students and the Loughborough Institutional Repository. Master of Science dissertation, Loughborough University. 104−10.
- Quinn, B. (2010). Reducing Psychological Resistance to Digital Repositories. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(2):67−75. Retrieved from: https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/viewFile/3145/2759accessedon28/02/2017. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i2.3145
- Roy, Bijan Kumar; Mukhopadhyay Parthasarathi and Biswas, Subal Chandra (2011). An Analytical Study of Institutional Digital Repositories in India. Library Philosophy and Practice (e- journal), Retrieved from: http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/ accessed on 01/03/2016.
- Sara R. Thompson; Deborah A Holms-Wong and Janis F. Brown (2006). Institutional Repositories: Beware the Field of Dreams Fallacy, Special Libraries Association Science and Technology Division 2006 Contributed Paper, Accessed on: 01/03/2016. Retrieved from: http://units.sla.org/ division/dst/Annual% 0Conference%20Contributed%20 Papers/2006papers/2006papers.html.
- Xia, J. (2008). A Comparison of Subject and Institutional Repositories in Self-Archiving Practices. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6): 489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016.
- There are currently no refbacks.