Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Total views : 7579

Indian Forensic Science Research Literature: A Bibliometric Study of its Growth, Authorship and Publication Patterns

Affiliations

  • Forensic Sciences Department, Mylapore, Chennai - 4, India
  • Lekshmipuram College of Arts & Science, Kanyakumari District, India

Abstract


A bibliometric analysis of the growth, authorship and publication patterns of forensic science literature for the period 2001 to 2013 was done using the data obtained from PubMed. MS-Excel worksheet was used for data analysis. The study revealed the exponential growth of forensic science literature. The relative growth rate fell from 0.83 in the year 2002 to 0.17 in the year 2013. The mean collaborative Index was 3.5; mean degree of collaboration was 0.89; mean collaborative coefficient was 0.6119 and mean modified collaborative coefficient was 0.6121 during the period of study. Forty one authors have contributed more than one percent of the total publication. Ten journals have contributed more than one percent of the total papers. Among these 'Journal of Forensic&Legal Medicine' ranks first with 16.10% papers. Cluster map of co-words was also created using VOSviewer.

Keywords

Authorship Pattern, Bibliometrics, Forensic Science, Research Collaboration.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 18)

References


  • Saferstein, R. (2001). Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2p.
  • Nanda, B.B. and Tewari, R.K. (2001). Forensic Science in India: A vision for the Twenty-First Century. New Delhi: Select Publishers, 30p.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4): 348–349.
  • Roy, P.M. (1983). Towards a Theory of Citing in Citation Analysis Studies. In: Developing Horizons in Library and Information Science: Ranganathan’s tenth death anniversary commemoration volumes, edited by Sharma, C.D. & Vyas, Kailash. Jaipur: Print Well.
  • VOSviewer. Retrived from http://www.vosviewer.com (Accessed on 01 March 2014).
  • Sauvageau, A.; Desnoyers, S. and Godin, A. (2009). Mapping the literature in forensic science: a bibliometric study of North American journals from 1980 to 2005. The Open Forensic Science Journal, 2: 41–46.
  • Jeyasekar, J.J. and Saravanan, P. (2014). A Scientometrics Analysis of Global Forensic Science Literature, Library Philosophy and Practice. [Accessed on 22 March 2014] Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/ 1024
  • Mahapatra M. (1985). On The Validity of the Theory of Exponential Growth of Scientific Literature. The paper presented at 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, p. 61–70.
  • Karpagam, R.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Natarajan, M. and Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990-2009. Scientometrics, 89: 501–522.
  • Price, D. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 119p.
  • Lawani, S.M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A 268 bibliometric study [Ph.D Thesis]. Florida State University, 395p.
  • Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6: 33–38.
  • Savanur, K. and Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: a new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84: 365–371.
  • Ajiferuke, I.; Burell, O. and Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14: 42–433.
  • Wulder, M. A practical guide to the use of selected multivariate statistics. [Accessed on 15 July 2014] Retrieved from http://www.psych.yorku.ca/lab/psy6140/DataScreeningChecklist.pdf
  • McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(6): 433–443.
  • Tryon, R.C. and Bailey, D.E. (1970). Cluster analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.