Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Total views : 3736

Ranganathan's Universe of Knowledge and Categorical Thinking

Affiliations

  • CNR-Institute for Complex Systems, Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 1000015 Monterotondo St. (RM), Italy

Abstract


This paper examines Ranganathan's idea of the universe of knowledge and highlights how his search for a new approach to classification (beyond the enumerative model) was influenced by this idea. It then scrutinizes Ranganathan approach in the light of the cultural background in which it developed. In particular, his PMEST is looked at against the background of the Indian philosophical tradition, comparing it with the Vaisesika categorial systems. Fìnally, the role of categorial systems as a cognitive means is analyzed. Certain basic categories have surfaced within the Indo-European linguistic and cultural frame in different ages and latitudes. The fact that they are somehow, culturally constructed does not undermine their role of establishing the meaningful domain of discourse of a cultural tradition.

Keywords

Ranganathan, S.R., Fundamental Categories, Facet Analysis, Indian Philosophy, Vaisesika Hilosophy.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 16)

References


  • Adhikary, Madhabmohan and Nandi, Amitava. (2003) Ideas of Ranganathan‟s classification theory pervaded by Oriental philosophy. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 40: 275-284.
  • Ambuel, David. (1998) Ontology in Indian philosophy. In: Craig, Edward, ed., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, p.118-127.
  • Arena, Leonardo V. (1987) Il Vaisesika Sutra di Kanada: introduzione, testo, traduzione, commento, lessico. Urbino: Quattroventi.
  • Barite, Mario G. (2000). The Notion of „Category‟. Its implications in subject Analysis and in the construction and evaluation of indexing languages. Knowledge Organization, 27(1/2): 4-10.
  • Broughton, Vanda. (2001) Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 7: 67–102.
  • Broughton, Vanda. (2004) Essential classification, London: Facet.
  • Cassirer, Ernst. (1923) Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie. In Festschrift für Paul Hensel. Göttingen: Ohag-Greiz i.V, p.105-127.
  • Ceruti, Mauro. (1994) Constraints and possibilities: the knowledge of evolution and the evolution of knowledge. Lausanne: Gordon and Breach.
  • Dahlberg, Ingetraut. (1978). Ontical structures and universal classification. Bangalore: Sarada Rangathanan Endowment for Library Science.
  • Faddegon, Barend. (1918) The Vaicesika-System: described with the help of the oldest texts. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.
  • Glazier, Jack D. and Glazier, Rhonda R. (2003) Cultural roots of modern classification. In: Frías, José Antonio and Travieso, Críspulo, eds. Tendencias de Investigación en Organización del Conocimiento: 4° Coloquio Internacional de Ciencias de la Documentación: 6° Congreso del Capitulo Español de ISKO: Salamanca: 5-7 mayo 2003, Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, p. 211-215.
  • Goddard, Cliff. (1994) Semantic theory and semantic universals. In: Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna, eds. Semantic and lexical Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 7-30.
  • Grimes, John, A. (1996) Concise dictionary of Indian philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Hjørland, Birger. (2003) Fundamental of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 30: 87-111.
  • Hjørland, Birger. (2007) Semantics and knowledge organization. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41: 367–405.
  • Hjørland, Birger. (2013) Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49: 545–557.
  • Iyer, Hemalata. (1995) Classificatory structures. Concepts, relations and representations. Würzburg: ErgonVerlag.
  • Keith, Arthur B. (1977) (originally published 1921). Indian logic and atomism: an exposition of the Nyaya and Vaisesika system. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp.
  • Körner, Stephan. (1970) Categorial frameworks. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kumar, Krishnan. (1974) Theory of classification, 14th rev. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.
  • Kumar, Shashiprabha. (2009) The concept of categories in Vaisesika philosophy. In Shivdasani Conference 2009 ‘Thinking Inside the Box: The Concept of a Category in Indian Philosophy’, Oxford University, UK. Available http://www.ocvhs.com/research/shivdasani-conference-2009.
  • Kwan, Tze-wan. (1995) The doctrine of categories and the topology of concern. Annalecta Husserliana, 46: 243-302.
  • Mazzocchi, Fulvio and Gnoli, Claudio. (2006) Il Vaisesika e le categorie di Ranganathan. AIDA Informazioni, 24(3-4): 17-28.
  • Mazzocchi, Fulvio and Gnoli, Claudio. (2010). S.R. Ranganathan's PMEST categories: analyzing their philosophical background and cognitive function. Information Studies, 16: 133-147.
  • Mazzocchi, Fulvio. (2013) Images of thought and their relation to classification. The tree and the net. Knowledge Organization,. 6: in press.
  • Miksa, Francis L. (1998) The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post-modern library. Albany, NY: Forest Press.
  • Mill, John Stuart. (1872) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. In two volumes. 8th ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
  • Mohanty, Jitendra Nath. (2000) Classical Indian philosophy. Lanham, ML: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Moss, R. (1964) Categories and relations: origins of two classification theories. American Documentation, 15: 296–301.
  • Nakamura, Hajime. (1992) A comparative history of ideas. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Olson, Hope A. (2002) Classification and universality: application and construction. Semiotica, 139: 377-391.
  • Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. (1951) Philosophy of library classification. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  • Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. (1952) Elements of classification. 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
  • Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. (1964 – 1971) [Works published in] Library Science with a slant to Documentation. Available http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/ 10150/105050/20/memor_ft.pdf
  • Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. (1967) Prolegomena to Library Classification. Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.
  • Robinson, Lyn and Maguire, Mike. (2010) The rhizome and the tree: changing metaphors for information organisation. Journal of Documentation, 66: 604-613.
  • Sankey, Howard. (2011) Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42: 562-570.
  • Satija, Mohinder P. and Singh, Jagtar. (2010) Colon Classification. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Third Edition. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Sayers, William Charles Berwick. (1918). An introduction to library classification. London: Grafton and Co.
  • Shah, Pravin K. (1993). Six universal substances (Dravyas or Entities). Available .
  • Trendelenburg, Adolf. (1846) Geschichte der Kategorienlehre, Berlin: Verlag von G. Bethge.
  • Vickery, Brian C. (1960) Faceted classification: a guide to the construction and use of special schemes. London: ASLIB.
  • Vickery, Brian C. (1966) Faceted classification schemes. New Brunswick, NJ: Graduate School of Library Science at Rutgers University.
  • Violi, Patrizia. (2001) Meaning and experience. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1958) Philosophical investigations. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.