Discovery and Access Systems: Discussion of Value Added Dimensions Using Twitter
Authors
-
Department of Information Studies, College of Computing and Information, University at Albany, State University of New York, 135 Western Avenue, Albany, NY 12222
Hemalata Iyer -
Dixie State University Library, 225 South 700 East, St. George, UT 84790, USAAmber J. D'Ambrosio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2013/v50i6/43833Keywords:
Online Catalogues, OPAC, Next Generation Catalogues, Twitter.Abstract
The use of hashtags in Twitter closely resembles the use of controlled vocabulary in online library catalogs. This natural link between this micro-blogging tool and library catalogs offers an opportunity to consider how Twitter and its accompanying hashtags can contribute to innovations in the 21st century library catalog. One of the most important aspects of libraries as physical places is their role as social spaces, a role they have yet to successfully fulfill in their online presence. Incorporating social media tools such as Twitter into library catalogs offers a venue for conversation and interaction to simulate the experience of users present in physical library spaces. Twitter’s hashtags offer a means of aggregating conversations and information on topics from the catalog, librarians and users and facilitating the growth of online communities. The benefits of integrating Twitter into the online library catalog can be viewed from the framework of the Eisenberg-Dirk modification of Taylor’s value-added model, which acknowledges the developing interactivity of information systems. Additional insight is possible by using the Chang Iyer morphological box of Twitter application, which is based on Ames and Newman’s taxonomy of tagging motivations, to analyze possible value-added attributes of each interface feature.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aharony, Noa. (2010) Twitter use in libraries: An exploratory analysis, Journal of Web Librarianship. 4(4): 333-350;
Forrestal, Valerie. Making Twitter work: a guide for the uninitiated, the skeptical, and the pragmatic, The Reference Librarian, 52(½): 146-151;
Stuart, David. What are libraries doing on Twitter? Online, 34(1): 45-47.
American Library Association. (2005) Current issues and developments related to metadata: Thoughts and opinions, Library Technology Reports, Nov/Dec 2005, 41(6): 45-57;
Iyer, Hemalata and Lucy Bungo. (2011). An examination of semantic relationships between professionally assigned metadata and user generated tags for popular literature in complementary and alternative medicine. Information Research, 16(3) paper 482. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper482.html
Ames, M. and Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 971-980.
Chang, Hsia-Ching and Hemalata Iyer. (2012) Trends in Twitter hashtag applications: design features for value-added dimensions t future library catalogues. Library Trends, 61(1): 248-258.
Denton, William and Sarah J. (2011) Coysh. Usability testing for VuFind at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 29(2): 301-319.
Dominguez, Daisy V. and Steven Ovadia. (2011) What’s next for collection management and managers, Collection Management, 36(3): 145-153;
Petit, Joan. Twitter and Facebook for user collection requests, Collection Management, 36(4): 253-258.
Eisenberg, Michael B. and Lee Dirk. (2008). Taylor’s Value-Added Model: Still relevantafter all these years, Paper presented at the iConference, iFutures: Systems, Selves, Society, February 2008, Los Angeles, CA. http://www.ischools.org/conference08/pc/PA3-4_iconf08. pdf (accessed November 18, 2011);
Scholl, Hans J.; Michael B. Eisenberg; Lee Dirks, and Timothy S. Carlson. The TEDS framework for assessing information systems from a human actors’ perspective: Extending and repurposing, Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4)(2011): 789-804.
Avena, Andy. (2008) Three new ways to experience WorldCat.org, NextSearch, 16: 14-15,20.
Mathews, Brian S. (2010) Twitter and the library: Thoughts on the syndicated lifestyle, Journal of Web Librarianship, 2(4): 589-593.
Smith-Yoshimura, Karen. (2010) Social metadata, NextSearch, 15: 14-15.
Storey, Tom. (2007) A WorldCat community, NextSearch, 7: 16-17.
Storey, Tom. (2009) The ripple effect: Pt.1 Extending the library reach, NextSearch, 13: 4-9.
Taylor, R.S. (1982) Value-added processes in the information life cycle, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 33(5): 341–346;
Taylor, R. S. Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.
Taylor, Robert S. (1968) Question-negotiation and information seeking, College and Research Libraries, 29(3): 178-194.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2013-12-26
Published 2013-12-14
