Scientific Productivity of Polymer Science Research: A Scientometric Study

Authors

  • Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad–580 003
  • Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad–580 003, Karnataka State
  • Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad–580 003, Karnataka State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2014/v51i1/47204

Keywords:

Scientometrics, Polymer Science, Scientific Productivity, J-Gate

Abstract

The present study discusses the scientific productivity of polymer science research as reflected in J-Gate for the period from 2000-2009. This study investigates the authorship pattern, geographical distribution of contributors, highly productive authors, highly preferred journals by the scientists, sectoral distribution, Degree of Collaboration (DC) and Collaborative Co-efficient (CC) and growth pattern of polymer science research by calculating relative growth rate and doubling time for publication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Septo, R; Horie, K; Kitayama, T. and Abe, A. (2003). Mission and challenges of polymer science and technology. Pure Applied Chemistry, 75(10):1359–1369.

Sperling, L.H. (2005). Introduction to Physical Polymer Science. Ed 4. New Jersy: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-70606-9

Lawani, S.M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citation in cancer research: a bibliometric study [Ph.D. Theses]. Florida: Florida State University.

Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1): 33–38.

Ajiferuke, I; Burell, Q, Tague, J. (1983). Collaborative coefficient; a single measure of the degree of collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1): 421–433.

Published

2014-02-06

How to Cite

Hadagali, G. S., Kumbar, B. D., & Keshava. (2014). Scientific Productivity of Polymer Science Research: A Scientometric Study. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 51(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2014/v51i1/47204
Received 2014-02-25
Accepted 2014-02-25
Published 2014-02-06