Undergraduates’ Preferences and Information Use Behaviour


  • A.C. Joshi Library, Panjab University, Chandigrah – 160014
  • Panjab University, Chandigrah – 160014




Information Needs, Information Seeking, NIT, Professional Students, Srinagar


The current study is a descriptive survey of undergraduate students of the National Institute of Technology, (NIT), Srinagar. The lacunae observed may lead to a better understanding of the information needs of present day college students and how they are satisfying these information needs. A survey was conducted from April to June 2017. A questionnaire was distributed to 130 undergraduate students of NIT, Srinagar. Out of which 107 filled-in questionnaires were returned. The disproportionate random sampling method was adopted. The study revealed that library is regularly used and there is a notable change in using the library resources by the undergraduates. The web resources are used scarcely. It is envisaged that the study will benefit the NIT library to improve their resources as per the need and demands of the users.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Ackerman, R., and Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086

Adler, M. (1940). How to read a book: The art of getting a liberal education. New York: Simon And Shuster Inc.

Agboola, I. O. (2010). Use of print and electronic resources by agricultural science students in Nigerian Universities. Library and Information Science Research, 32(1), 62–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.011

Austin, B., and Taylor, K. (2007a). Reserves, electronic reserves and student copying practices at the University of Colorado, Boulder: Is digital different? Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Documentary Delivery, and Electronic Reserves, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J474v18n01_04

Austin, B., and Taylor, K. (2007b). Assessment of electronic reserve services at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Documentary Delivery, and Electronic Reserves, 17(1-2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J474v17n01_10

Chettri, K. and Rout, S. K. (2013). Reading Habits: An overview. Journal of Humanities and Social Science. (I05R-JH55), 14(6), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-01461317

Dhingra, N., and Mahajan, P. (2011). Print vs electronic journal usage: A case study of universities of Punjab and Chandigarh (India). Journal of Knowledge and communication management, 1(1–2), 73-89.

Dilevkoa, J. and Gottliebb, L. (2002). Print sources in an electronic age: A vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(6), 381– 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00341-5

Dillon, A., McKnight, C., and Richardson, J. (1988). Reading from paper versus reading from screen. The Computer Journal, 31(5), 457–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/ 31.5.457

Fenton, H. (2014). BYU finds students prefer printed course materials. Books and Manuals, Case Studies, Industry Trends, Thought Leadership. Retrieved from: https://digitalprinting.blogs.xerox.com/2014/07/08/byu-finds-students-prefer-printedcourse-materials /#.V5MFcvl95My

Hoseth, A., and McLure, M. (2012). Perspectives on E-books from instructors and students in the social sciences. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 278–88. https:// doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n3.278

Hughes, J. (2004). Cost comparison of photocopying vs. printing articles for reserve reading. Journal of Access Services, 2(2), 53–5. https://doi.org/10.1300/J204v02n02_05

Internet2 eTextbook Spring (2012). Pilot Final Project Report. Retrieved from https://www.internet2.edu/media/medialibrary/ 2013/10/07/eText-Spring-2012-Pilot-Report.pdf.

Kapoor, K. (2010). Print and electronic resources: Usage statistics at Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Library. Program, 44(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331011019690

Lorbeer, E. (2015). Print vs. digital textbooks and the challenge of meeting student needs”, Discover the Future of Research. Retrieved from: https://hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/blog/2015/07/31/print-vs-digitaltextbookand-the-challenge-of-meeting-student-needs.

Milliot, J. (2013). BEA 2013: The E-book boom years. Publishers Weekly.

Panigrahi, C. and Panda, K. C. (1996). Reading interests and information sources of school going children: A case study of two English medium schools of Rourkela, India. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(1), 57–65.

Quadri, O. and Abomoge, S. (2013). A survey of reading and internet use habits among undergraduate students in selected university libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 3(11), 38–46.

Raphael, T. E. (1984). The contexts of school-based literacy. Random House, New York.

Robinson, S. (2011). Student use of a free online textbook. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(3).

Sehn, T. C. M., and Fragoso, S. (2015). The synergy between eBooks and printed books in Brazil. Online Information Review, 39(3), 401–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-012015-0006

Shafi, S. M., and Loan, F. A. (2010). Reading habits among college students of Kashmir across gender. Journal of TRIM, 6(2), 92–103.

Trivedi, M., and Joshi, A. (2009). Usage of electronic journals (e-journals) versus print journals by healthcare professionals in H M Patel Centre for Medical Care and Education (HMPCME). Journal of Health Informatics in Developing countries, 3(1), 3–16.

Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., and Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers and Education, 55(3), 945–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005

Wu, M., and Chen, S. (2012). How graduate students perceive, use and manage electronic resources. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 64(6), 641–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211281779



How to Cite

Chohda, N., & Kumar, S. (2019). Undergraduates’ Preferences and Information Use Behaviour. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 56(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2019/v56i2/141405



Received 2019-01-17
Accepted 2019-04-22
Published 2019-04-30