Policies and Ethics

JOURNAL POLICIES

I Access Policy

Journal of Information and Knowledge is under paywall/Subscription. Readers who wish to access the full text should subscribe to the journal or can purchase individual articles.

II Submission Policy

There is no Charge/Fee for submitting manuscripts to Journal of Information and Knowledge. It is completely FREE.

III Peer-review Policy

All the manuscripts submitted to Journal of Information and Knowledge will be subjected to Double Blind Peer Review process. The Double Blind Peer Review is practiced with the intention that there is a fair review to help improve the research submission.

  • Double Blind Peer Review--- Authors are kept anonymous. Reviewers will not know who the author is for the manuscript assigned to them. Likewise the author will not be aware of who the reviewer is for their manuscript.
  • The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the subject area of the submission.
  • The review reports from both the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
  • Editor-In-Chief (EIC) will make the final decision, based on reviewer’s comments.
  • EIC can ask one or more editorial board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
  • Associate editors and review editors provide the administrative support to maintain the integrity of peer review process.
  • Authors need to make the necessary changes based on review comments before it is considered for acceptance.
  • Canvassing in any form, at any stage of the article will lead to rejection of the manuscript.
  • Duration of review process from the time the manuscript is assigned to a reviewer, would be close to 45 working days.
  • The article accepted for publication will be queued for the next issue of publication.

IV Licensing Policy

CC BY-NC-ND

This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.

 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.

ND: No derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.

V Archiving Policy

  • Authors sign the copy right transfer statement and still retain their rights to self-archive the articles.
  • The accepted manuscript may be archived on the author’s website.
  • Authors can deposit in any repository their works, but it should not be the final version as available with the publisher.
  • Author can post his/her version provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication with a link to the published article, it has to be the DOI number link. The Final published article is available at Informatics Journals (URL:https://srels.org/index.php/sjim/issue/archive)

VI Advertisement Policy

Currently there is no policy to accept advertisements. However, if the publishers along with the editorial team decide to accept commercial advertisements, a policy would be drafted appropriately.

VII Informed Consent

All authors/Researchers submitting original research work which discusses about human case studies, Vulnerable human beings or Agricultural professionals, should obtain their consent prior to submitting the research work for review. The detailed set of consent form(s) as the case maybe should be submitted along with the manuscript. Each consent form should contain the clause of voluntarily consenting for the Procedure/intervention/making their case available to public as the case maybe.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) supports international ethical standards related to research and publication of research that relate to vulnerable groups and individuals. Examples of standards include WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (affirmed July 2018), The Belmont Report, and Economic and Social Research Council in the UK. These standards require that vulnerable populations and individuals from these populations receive specifically considered protections by all involved in the research enterprise, such as researchers and their teams, research sponsors and funders, the relevant research ethics approval committees, authors, editors, reviewers and publishers. (Source: The protection of vulnerable groups and individuals | COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics)

Research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, older adults, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, necessitates stringent ethical considerations to ensure the protection and well-being of participants. The journal is dedicated to upholding the highest ethical standards and requires all studies involving vulnerable populations to adhere to these comprehensive guidelines.

Research involving MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) and agricultural professionals presents unique ethical and methodological challenges, particularly when participants are from vulnerable populations. The journal requires all studies involving MOOCs to adhere to these comprehensive guidelines to ensure the ethical conduct of research.

VIII PUBLICATION ETHICS

The Journal of Information and Knowledge is an electronic Double Blind peer reviewed journal upholding the highest standards. Articles not in accordance with publication ethics and malpractices will be removed from publication if detected at any time. Plagiarism and research fabrication such as making up of data, manipulation of existing data, tables etc. and ethical clearance on the use of humans or animals for the study will also be checked. The journal reserves the right to use plagiarism detecting software to screen submitted papers at any time and suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing will be reported immediately.

I Authors Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • Their work is original
  • Must not have been published elsewhere
  • Other authors, contributors or sources should be appropriately credited
  • They are responsible for language editing before submission
  • Their work has not been copied or plagiarized in whole or part from any other work
  • The financial support and conflict of interest for the project / research work if any should be disclosed
  • They are obliged to notify the editor if any error or inaccuracy is discovered and cooperate with the editor to correct the same

Articles should be submitted using online procedures. Simultaneous publication in more than one publication is a breach of publication ethics.

Informatics Journals, as a publisher follows COPE and has adopted COPE’s best practice guidelines for dealing with ethical issues in a journal. The Journal Members (Editors, Editorial Board Members and the Editorial Manager) have consented to adopt COPE as it meets the purpose and objective of the Journal.

The following is a summary of COPE’s international standards for authors of scholarly research publications and describes responsible research reporting practice. The comprehensive guidelines can be downloaded here

  • The research being reported should have been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and should comply with all relevant legislation.
  • Researchers should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.
  • Researchers should strive to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.
  • Researchers should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarised, and has not been published elsewhere.
  • Authors should take collective responsibility for submitted and published work.
  • The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals' contributions to the work and its reporting.

II. Author Contribution Details

  • Conceptualization and Design
    • Definition: This includes the initial idea, design of the study, and the overall conceptual framework.
    • Responsibilities: Who conceived the research idea? Who was responsible for designing the experiments or the theoretical framework?
  • Data Collection and Processing
    • Definition: This involves gathering data, conducting experiments, or carrying out fieldwork.
    • Responsibilities: Who collected the data? Who was involved in organizing and processing the raw data?
  • Analysis and Interpretation
    • Definition: This includes analyzing data, interpreting the results, and drawing conclusions.
    • Responsibilities: Who performed the statistical analysis or data interpretation? Who contributed to understanding the implications of the findings?
  • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Definition: This involves writing the first draft of the manuscript.
    • Responsibilities: Who wrote the initial draft of the manuscript? Which sections were written by which authors?
  • Writing – Review and Editing
    • Definition: This includes revising the manuscript based on feedback, improving clarity, and making substantive changes.
    • Responsibilities: Who reviewed and edited the draft? Who provided critical feedback and helped in revising the manuscript?
  • Visualization
    • Definition: This involves creating figures, tables, and other visual elements of the paper.
    • Responsibilities: Who created the visual content, such as figures, charts, and diagrams?
  • Supervision
    • Definition: This includes oversight of the research project and guidance to the research team.
    • Responsibilities: Who supervised the research? Who provided administrative and technical support?
  • Funding Acquisition
    • Definition: This involves securing financial support for the research.
    • Responsibilities: Who obtained the funding? Who was responsible for grant writing and budget management?
  • Project Administration
    • Definition: This includes the management and coordination of the research project.
    • Responsibilities: Who managed the project? Who ensured that milestones were met and that the project was on track?
  • Relevant conflicts of interest should be disclosed.

III. Editor's Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • The submitted manuscript undergoes Double-blind peer review before publishing
  • They will strive to prevent any conflict of interest between the author and editorial and review personnel
  • All the information related to the submitted manuscript is kept confidential prior to publishing

IV Publisher Responsibilities

They must ensure that

  • Published content is not manipulated or changed.
  • Authors, Editors and Reviewers adhere to their responsibilities and work flow
  • Appropriate consent is sought from authors prior to publishing the content.
  • There is no Copyright or License violations.
  • All content is published in accordance to the Policy and Ethics statement of the Journal.

V Reviewers Responsibility

They must ensure that

  • Reviews the manuscript and provides suitable comments for improvement
  • Promptness in notifying the editor about his inability to review the manuscript
  • Maintains confidentiality about the manuscript obtained for review, by not discussing with others
  • Standards of Objectivity preserved by reviewing the manuscripts objectively with clear views and supporting arguments and without any personal criticism
  • Acknowledgement of Sources
  • All References not cited by author should be removed. All citations should be accompanied with any previously reported observation, derivation or argument.
  • The editors should be intimated for any overlap of the reviewed manuscript with any other published paper.
  • Disclosures and Conflict of Interest – manuscripts having conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or any other relationships or connections with institutions connected to the paper will not be considered.

VI Manuscript Withdrawal Policy

Authors must abide by these policies after submission of their manuscript.

Authors must provide their consent to publish their manuscript prior to peer-review process. Withdrawing an already confirmed manuscript after it has been accepted would attract a minimal article handling charge.

VII. Copyright Policies

All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publishers- Informatics Publishing Limited and Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS). The publishers require the authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit the publishers to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form.

VIII. Disclaimer

The author(s) of each article published in this Journal is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; neither the Journal of Information and Knowledge nor its editors or publisher or anyone else involved in creating, producing or distribution assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information provided in the Journal, nor shall they be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages arising out of the use of Journal of Information and Knowledge.

IX. Plagiarism

For every Journal, the peer review process is at the heart of the success of publishing. As part of our commitment to the protection and enhancement of the peer review process, The Journal of Information and Knowledge would like to ensure that all published articles are within the accepted level of plagiarism. The Journal uses the very well and widely accepted Plagiarism detection tool, iThenticate. All submitted Manuscripts are first subjected to Plagiarism check and then the Publishing cycle commences.

In case, plagiarism is detected during review/editorial process, such manuscript(s) will be rejected immediately and we can also consider other steps depending upon the seriousness of the case. If the plagiarism is proven after publication, such manuscript(s) will be retracted from our website and appropriate announcement will be placed in this regards. Further, "Journal of Information and Knowledge" can bring such instances in notice of author's funding agencies, author's institutes (where they work) and to the original authors whose work has been plagiarized. Please report the plagiarism to editor@informaticsglobal.ai

IX Corrections and Retraction Policy

Article Withdrawal

Either the Publisher or the author of the article can withdraw the same. An article can be withdrawn at any point in time before it is formally published online in its final form with complete information about volume, issue, page numbers, DOI and article ID. If the article withdrawal request has been initiated by an author, they need to submit a signed letter to the Editorial Office prior to article withdrawal.
Publisher can withdraw an article if it is found to violate the ethical publishing guidelines, like Duplicate publication, Plagiarism, Fraudulent usage of data, Multiple Submissions, Bogus claims of authorship. In both the cases, the article PDF will be removed and a note that the article has been withdrawn will be displayed

Corrections to an Article

If an error is discovered in an already published article, Erratum, Corrigendum or Addendum will be published in an issue once the proposed changes are in agreement with Publisher and Author. Only significant corrections will be published such as – Inaccurately published information etc. Minor corrections like spelling mistakes or grammatical errors which do not alter the understanding of the paper will not be corrected. When a correction is published, the original article reference will be given in the corrected PDF and vice-versa. Only the corrections will be mentioned. Charges will be decided while corrections are made depending on the number of corrections etc.

Original article will not be modified, but correction link will be available on the article page. This will help readers to read and download both the PDFs.

An Errata will be published only when mistakes are recognized in the published article which went unnoticed during Editing and Layout setting in Figures, Tables etc.

Corrigenda is published when authors realise that errors in the published article could affect the validity of the scientific content, or its accuracy. If a reader detects an error in a published article, they can submit the same as a letter to the editor. The author, editor and a reviewer would then assess the validity of the error pointed out. Corrigenda will then be published with reference to the letter and the answers provided by the author.

Addenda is published if authors have omitted a significant information inadvertently during manuscript submission and would like to add this content to the article after publication. The information provided for addendum will undergo peer-review prior to editorial acceptance. Addendum publication is very rare and will be allowed by Editorial team only if the information is very much essential to understand a significant portion of the published article.

Article Retractions

Retractions are published in circumstances like, if the conclusions of a paper is found to be based on faulty logic or computation by new information made available after the paper has been published; if the paper is based on falsified or fabricated data, if plagiarized data has been published or if duplicate publications exist. The retractions are decided on a case by case basis by the editor in consultation with the authors and the reviewers of the article. A signed statement from the authors will be required to be submitted to the Editorial Office before an article can be retracted. Agreement of all authors of a paper is required before a retraction can be published. If some co-authors do not agree to the retraction of the article, the retraction will be published as decided by the editor, clearly identifying the dissenting co-authors. When a retraction is published it will be linked to the article being corrected and a link to the retractions page will also be placed on the article published earlier. On the webpages of the retracted article the bibliographic information will be retained on all the pages, however, the article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been retracted from the journal. The PDF version of the article will be retained to preserve the integrity of record, but will be marked to show that the article has been retracted. In cases of partial retractions, the retraction notice will be labeled as 'Partial Retraction' or 'Retraction in Part'.

Article Removal

In exceptional circumstances an article may be removed from the journal. This may happen if any legal issues arise or are expected to arise in context of the article, the distribution of the article is stopped by an court order, the contents of the article may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the article violates copyright of others, or if the article is found to be defamatory or infringing on other's legal rights. When an article is removed from the journal the bibliographic information and the PDF file will also be removed. The article text will be replaced by a note stating that the article has been removed from the journal and the reason for removal.

Article Replacement

If an article is found to contain false or inaccurate data which may pose a serious health risk if acted upon by others, the authors of the original article may wish to retract the article and replace it with a corrected version. In this case, the article will be retracted, following the procedure of retraction of an article, with the difference that a link to the corrected re-published article will be placed on the HTML and PDF versions of the paper and on the page with the retraction notice.