Mapping and Visualization of Plagiarism Research
Authors
-
Department of Library and Information Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Central University, Lucknow
M. P. Singh -
Central Library, MGKVP, Varanasi; and Department of Library and Information Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Central University, LucknowVijay Kumar Bharati
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2020/v57i4/150863Keywords:
Academic Integrity, Bibliometrics, Ethics, Mapping, Plagiarism, Plagiarism DetectionAbstract
The paper seeks to map and visualize the published research on Plagiarism indexed by Scopus database during 2010-2019. A total of 1882 articles were retrieved using keyword search TITLE: (plagiarism). Microsoft Excel is used for graphical representation of the data for document type and funding agencies, etc. and the VOS viewer science mapping framework (Van Eck & Waltman, 2010) is used for analyzing the research trends and collaboration among scientists, organizations, and countries. Research on Plagiarism is growing. The USA is the biggest collaborative country that has a larger number of scholarly publications followed by United Kingdom, India, China, Thailand, Spain, and Australia.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Chauhan, S. K. (2018). Research on plagiarism in India during 2002-2016: A bibliometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. 38(2): 69-74. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.2.12298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.2.12298
Craig, A., et al. (2019). Definitions, formulas, and simulated examples for plagiarism detection with FAIR metrics. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 56(1): 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.6
García-Romero, A. and Estrada-Lorenzo, J. M. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of plagiarism and self-plagiarism through Déjà vu. Scientometrics. 101(1): 381-96. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1387-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1387-3
Garfield, E. (1979). Scientometrics comes to age. Current Contents. 46: 5-10. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/ essays/v4p313y1979-80.pdf.
Kokol, P., Zavrsnik, J., Zeleznik, and Vosner, H. B. (2016). Creating a self-plagiarism research topic typology through bibliometric visualisation. Journal of Academic Ethics. 14(3): 221-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805016-9258-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9258-6
Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore; p. 61-70.
Mariani, J., Francopoulo, G. and Paroubek, P. (2016). A study of reuse and plagiarism in speech and natural language processing papers.
Mazov, N. A., Gureev, V. N. and Kosyakov, D. V. (2016). On the development of a plagiarism detection model based on citation analysis using a bibliographic database. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 43(4): 236-40. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688216040092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688216040092
Plagiarism TITLE (plagiarism) AND PUBYEAR > 2009 AND PUBYEAR < 2020. (2019). Scopus database Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/.
Schubert, A. and Glänzel, W. (2015). Is there protection against copying? Thoughts about plagiarism, Orvosi Hetilap. 156(50): 2052-53. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2015.30225. PMid: 26639647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2015.30225
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2020-08-28
Published 2020-08-30
