Adapting Social Networking Sites for Scholarly Communication among Postgraduate Students in Kenyan Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2021/v58i5/165231Keywords:
Academics, Faculty Members, Kenya, Postgraduate Student, Scholar, Scholarly Communication, Social Networking SiteAbstract
The study examines how postgraduate students use Social Networking Sites (SNS) in communicating scholarly information in Kenyan universities with reference to use of WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Academia.edu. The objectives of this studies are: to determine how social networking sites are used for scholarly communication and to find out the reasons for using social networking sites by postgraduate students. Descriptive research design was used to guide the study. From four universities with a sample size of 242 postgraduate students who filled the questionnaire. The findings of the study showed that postgraduate students use SNS to share research ideas, class experiences, to know where to meet for lessons, when lectures are starting and updates on deadlines for submitting class assignments; the reasons for using SNS are for academic purposes and group discussion. In conclusion, the findings of the study show that postgraduate students use SNS to share daily experiences within campus rather than sharing information on how and where they can get scholarly information that will enable them to add new body of knowledge.Downloads
References
Al-Aufi, A.S. and Fulton, C. (2014). Use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication in humanities and social sciences disciplines. Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 147: 36-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.135
Al-Aufi, A.S. and Fulton, C. (2015). Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: Acrossinstitutional study. The Electronic Library, 33(2): 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093
Al-Aufi, A.S. and Genoni, P. (2010). An investigation of digital scholarship and disciplinary culture in Oman. Library Hi Tech, 28(3): 414-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011076666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011076666
Al-Daihani, S.M., Al-Qallaf, J.S. and Alsaheeb, S.A. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global, Memory and Communication, 67(6/7): 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091
Al-Muomen, N., Chaudhry, A.S. and Al-Othinah, O. (2020). Perceptions regarding academic social networks for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8/9): 597-611. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0007
Arnold, N. and Paulus, T. (2010). Using social networking sites for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking and community building. Internet and Higher Education, 134(4): 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002
Ashraf, K. and Mohamed, H.K. (2016). Scholarly use of social media. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63: 132-139.
Asmi, N.A. and Margam, M. (2018). Academic social networking sites for researchers in Central Universities of Delhi: A study of research gate and academia. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(1/2): 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2017-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2017-0004
Bicen, H., Sadikoglu, S. and Sadikoglu, G. (2015). The impact of social networks on undergraduate students learning foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 186: 1045-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.04.072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.072
Boyd, D. (2007). Social network sites: Public, private or what? Knowledge Tree 13. Available at: http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?p age-id=28.
Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Chen, B. and Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1): 87-104. https://doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1027
Dogoriti, E, Pange, J. and Anderson, G.S. (2014). The use of social networking and learning management systems in English language teaching in higher education. Campuswide Information Systems, 31(4): 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/CWIS-11-2013-0062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CWIS-11-2013-0062
Gichora, F.G. and Kwanya, T. (2015). The impact of Web 2.0 Tools on academic libraries in Kenya. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(2): 21-26. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2014.0518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2014.0518
Greenhow, C. (2011). Online social networks and learning. On the Horizon, 19(1): 4-12. https://doi. org/10.1108/10748121111107663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107663
Gu, F. and Widen-wulff, G. (2010). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: Afinish case study. The Electronic Library, 29(6): 762-776 https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111187999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111187999
Hilner, J. (2012). How to use online video in your classroom: how teachers can bring best in YouTube and other online video services to their students. Available at: http://www.edutopia.org/youtube-educational-videos-classroom.
Karimi et al. (2014). Applying the uses and gratification theory to compare higher education student’s motivation for using social networking sites: Experiences from Iran, Malaysia, United Kingdom, and South Africa. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(1): 53-72. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6115
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3): 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks. PewInternet and American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdf.
Lester, J. and Perini, M. (2010). Potential of social networking sites for distance education student engagement. New Direction for Community College, 50: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.406
Madhusudhan, M. (2012). Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: Astudy. The International Information and Library Review, 44: 100- 113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2012.10762919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2012.10762919
Manca, S. and Ranieri, M. (2017). Networked scholarship and motivations for social media use in scholarly communication. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2): 123-138. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2859
Manco, A. (2019). The use of social networking sites for scholarly by emergent social scientists: an affordance approach. Young Information Scientists, 4: 17-30.
Matto, G. (2015). Social Media in Higher Learning: Is it a Tool for Social or Academic Purpose? A Comparative Study between MoCU, Tanzania and LUANAR, Malawi. ISTAfrica 2015 Conference Proceedings. IIMC International Information Management Corporation; 2015. www.ISTAfrica.org/conference2015.
Muneja, P. and Abungu, A. (2012). Application of Web 2.0 Tools in Delivering Library Services: A Case of selected Libraries in Tanzania. Paper presented at SCECSAL XXth Conference Hosted by KLA on 4th-8th June 2012, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nkatha, M.G., Kimwele, M. and Okeyo G. (2015). The use of social networking sites for learning in institutions of higher learning. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 4(12): 51-56.
Ponte, D. and Simon, J. (2011). Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researchers’ opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials Review, 37(3): 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2011.10765376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2011.10765376
Procter, et al., (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communication: Philosophical transactions of the royal society. A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, 368(1926): 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155. PMid:20679121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155
Rowlands et al., (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3): 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306
Sawant, S. (2012). Transformation of scholarly communication cycle. Library Hi Tech News, 29(10): 21-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051211294482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051211294482
Stutzman, F. (2006). An Evaluation of Identity-Sharing behaviour in Social Network Communities. Paper Presented at the IDMAa and IMS Code Conference, Oxford Ohio.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 40: 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Ventura, R. and Quero, M.J. (2013). Using facebook in University Teaching: Apractical case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 83: 1032-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.192
Whiting, A. and Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A use and gratification approach. Qualitative Market Research International Journal, 16(4): 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2021-11-11
Published 2021-10-30