Evolution of Mutual Efforts in Libraries:The Consortia Boom

Authors

  • Library, Documentation and Information Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, 203, Barrackpore Trunk Road, Kolkata 700108, West Bengal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2016/v53i4/84262

Keywords:

Collaborative Librarianship, Consortia Boom, India, Library Cooperation, Mutual Efforts, Strategic Alliance.

Abstract

Library cooperation has been experienced by librarians for long. Indeed mutual efforts were viewed as essential by the early leaders of modern librarianship. This paper reviews the progressive development of library cooperation, and draws attention to the mutual-efforts done in libraries during sixteenth century and beyond. Thus gradual development of strategic alliances between the libraries has been discussed, and success stories are noted emphasizing on the initiatives in India. It also provides a brief historical sketch of library consortia, which was evident in the 1930s. The paper recognizes the importance of electronic consortium and their growth in the present century. Consortia are being treated as means for libraries to survive. Finally, as technological advancements have been alleviating many ills of information sharing activities; therefore, the spirits of cooperation are reinforced and mode of cooperation has undergone transformation and consortia boom is prevalent across the globe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Raychaudhury, A. & Pal, J. K. (2001). Internet services for exploring social science resources. IASLIC Bulletin. 46(4): 209-215.

O’Neill, E. T., & Gammon, J. A. Building collections cooperatively: analysis of collection use in the OhioLINK library consortium. In ACRL-2009. Paper presented in the 14th ACRL National Conference, 12-15 March, 2009, Seattle, Washington.

Kopp, J. (1998). Library consortia and information technology: the past, the present, and the promise. Information Technology and Libraries. 17(1): 7-12.

Kraus, J. W. (1975). Prologue to library cooperation. Library Trends. 24(2): 169-181.

Potter, W. G. (1997). Recent trends in statewide academic library consortia. Library Trends. 45(3): 416-434.

Dewey, Melvil (1986). Library co-operation and index to periodicals. The Library Journal. 11(1): 5-6.

Weber, David C. (1976). A century of cooperative programs among academic libraries. College & Research Libraries. 37(3): 206-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_37_03_205

McColvin, L. R. (1936). Library cooperation in Great Britain. Bulletin of the American Library Association. 30(10): 914-918.

Downs, Robert Bingham. One for all: a historical sketch of library cooperation, 1930-1970. In Proceedings of the symposium on the library of tomorrow, edited by Emily Miller Danton. American Library Association (ALA), Chicago, Illinois, 1939, pp.60-67.

Leavitt, S. E. (1941). Library cooperation. South Atlantic Bulletin. 7(2): 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3196328

Downs, Robert B. (1945). American Library Cooperation in Review. College & Research Libraries. 6 (Part II): 407-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_06_04_Part_2_407

Stanford, E. B. (1958). Increasing library resources through cooperation. Library Trends. 6(3): 296-308.

Chauhan, S. K., & Mahajan, P. (2013). Library consortia in India with special reference to UGC-Infonet digital library consortium. The International Information & Library Review. 45(3): 127-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2013.10766380

Nature.com (1999). User consortia emerge as 'brokers'. Nature. 397(6716):196-197. Accessed at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v397/n6716/pdf/397196a0.pdf (12 February 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/16555

Cuadra, Carlos A.; DeLanoy, Diana D.; Patrick, Ruth J.; Mantius, K. (1971). Report on study of academic library consortia – phase II (sponsored by US Office of Education, Washington, D. C.). Santa Monica, California: System Development Corporation, 15 November 1971, p.53.

Patrick, Ruth J. (1972). Guidelines for library cooperation: development of academic library consortia. Santa Monica, California: System Development Corporation, p.2.

Horton, Valerie. Whither Library Consortia? Collaborative Librarianship, 2013, 5(3), 150-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29087/2013.5.3.01

Harloe, B. & Budd, J. (1994). Collection development and scholarly communication in the era of electronic access. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 20(2): 83-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(94)90043-4

Nfila, R. B. & Darko-Ampem, K. (2002). The developments in academic library consortia from the 1960’s through 2000 – a review of literatures. Library Management. 23(4): 203-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120210429934

Allen, Barbara M. & Hirshon, Arnold (1998). Hanging together to avoid hanging separately: opportunities for academic libraries and consortia. Information Technology and Libraries. 17(1): 37-44.

Bostick, S. L. (2001). The history and development of academic library consortia in the United States: an overview. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 27(2): 128-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(00)00185-3

Hirshon, Arnold (2002). International Library Consortia. Journal of Library Administration. 35(1-2): 147-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v35n01_09

Davies, Bryn (2001). Consortia purchasing: a feasibility study for the UK veterinary and animal health field. Library Management. 22(8-9): 371-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120110406318

Gour, R.C. & Tripathi, M. (2012). Role of consortia in preservation of e-journals. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 59(3): 204-211.

Pal, J. K. & Das, P. K. (2007). Progress Through Partnership: Consortia Based e-Resource Subscription Initiatives in India. In proceedings of the workshop (CD version) on Consortia Based Subscription of Online Resources (CBSOR), Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, March 2007. Accessed from: http://www.isical.ac.in/~serial/consortia/CBSOR-08.pdf (22 February 2015).

Published

2016-08-05

How to Cite

Pal, J. K. (2016). Evolution of Mutual Efforts in Libraries:The Consortia Boom. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 53(4), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2016/v53i4/84262

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-12-05
Accepted 2016-07-12
Published 2016-08-05