A Study of Subject Headings vs. User Generated Tags

Authors

  • Sonali Dutta DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal
  • Subarna Kumar Das DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i3/168523

Keywords:

Folksonomy, Library Thing, Subject Heading List, Tagging, User-generated Tags, WorldCat

Abstract

User-generated tagging or folksonomy is one of the most popular Web 2.0 applications and has attracted the interest of libraries and information centres, which has developed services that facilitate user community collaboration. In the digital environment, social tagging has the potential to overcome certain limitations of traditional subject headings. The main objectives of this research paper are to identify the scope of user-generated tags as compared to Subject Heading Lists and to explore the extent to which these user-generated tags can be used to enhance subject access. In this research paper, the problem is comparison between the Subject heading List and user generated tags. This work is an exploratory research and has followed a case study method. Five searches were performed in Library Thing using its Tag mash feature (essentially a keyword search of the user tag field) using 5 tags. After searching articles and interpreting all data, a comparison between the subject heading list and User-generated tags have been made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Adamich, T. (2014). The Sears List -- An Old Friend With A 21st Century Look. Library Media Connection, 32(4), 43.

Bateman, S. (2007) “Collaborative Tagging : Folksonomy, Metadata, Visualization, e-Learning, Thesis.” HARVEST, University of Saskatchewan, 1 Dec. 2007, https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/etd-12112007-221606.

Ferris, A. M. (2018). Birth of a subject heading. Library Resources & Technical Services, 62(1), 16-27.

Hayman, S. (2007) “ FOLKSONOMIES AND TAGGING: New Developments in Social Bookmarking .” Ark Education, Ark Group Conference: Developing and Improving Classification Schemes, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.138.8884&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 16 Jan. 2022.

Mas, M.D. (2012) “Intelligent Interface Architectures for Folksonomy Driven Structure Network,” 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 2012, pp. 519-525, https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2012.158

Petek, M. (2012). Comparing user-generated and librariangenerated metadata on digital images. OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 28(2), 101 -111. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751211236659.

Rolla, P. (2009). User Tags versus Subject Headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174

Samadder, H. (2019). Subject Heading List Vs User- Generated Tags: A Case Study (dissertation). Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal.

West, W (2013). Tag, You’re IT: Enhancing Access to Graphic Novels. Portal: Libraries and the academy, 13(3), 301-324

Published

2022-06-28

How to Cite

Dutta, S., & Kumar Das, S. (2022). A Study of Subject Headings vs. User Generated Tags. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 59(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i3/168523

Issue

Section

Articles