Figshare: A One-Stop Shop for Research Data Management with Diverse Features and Services

Authors

  • University of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar - 190006
  • University of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar - 190006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i6/170789

Keywords:

Data Management, Data Sharing, Figshare, Repository, Research Data

Abstract

Research data management is recognized as an important concern for institutions. Various academic and research institutions today maintain different institutional repositories operating on different platforms to save and share research data. Researchers require a platform that ensures maximum accessibility, stability and reliability to share research data. Sharing data makes it possible to replicate studies, formulate new research questions, and generate new knowledge. One such platform used for sharing and preserving research data is “Figshare”. The purpose of this paper is to look at the journey of the Figshare platform and investigate the usefulness of this platform for sharing and preserving data. This paper provides an understanding of the platform for research institutions to employ for data management purposes. The research design of this article consists of non-empirical research majorly based on literature review and analysis. The literature analysis focused on the architecture, metadata handling capacities, interoperability, compatibility and services offered to researchers and research institutions by this platform. Focused literature searches were conducted across various electronic databases and this study tried to explore the solution that Figshare offers in supporting research data. Further, the article outlines the benefits of the Figshare repository and shows how this registry helps in the appropriate storage and sharing of research data. This article presents the potential of the Figshare platform that can be applied and used in different research disciplines for preserving and sharing research data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amorim, R. C., Castro, J. A., Silva, J. R. D., and Ribeiro, C. (2015). A comparative study of platforms for research data management: interoperability, metadata capabilities and integration potential. In New contributions in information systems and technologies (pp. 101-111). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 16486-1_10

Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., and Tani, A. (2016). Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing? Data Science Journal, 15, 6. https://doi. org/10.5334/dsj-2016-006

Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-1078. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.22634

Cho, J. (2017). A study on the sharing of research data in library and information science field. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 34(4), 59-79.

Cho, J. (2019). Subject analysis of LIS data archived in a Figshare using co-occurrence analysis. Online Information Review, 43(2), 256-264. https://doi. org/10.1108/OIR-12-2017-0369

David, P. A., and Bunn, J. A. (1988). The economics of gateway technologies and network evolution: Lessons from electricity supply history. Information Economics and Policy, 3(2), 165-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167- 6245(88)90024-8

Devarakonda, R., Palanisamy, G., Green, J. M., and Wilson, B. E. (2011). Data sharing and retrieval using OAI-PMH. Earth Science Informatics, 4(1), 1-5. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12145-010-0073-0

European Commission. (2020). Horizon 2020 open research data pilot and data management plan. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/ h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/openaccess- data-management/open-access_en.htm

Figshare API Documentation (n.d.). Available at: https:// docs.Figshare.com

Figshare for Institutions. (n.d.). Available at: https:// knowledge.Figshare.com/institutions

Figshare for Publishers. (n.d.). Available at: https:// knowledge.Figshare.com/publisher/workflows

Figshare help. (n.d.). Mission Statement & Core Beliefs. Available at: https://knowledge.Figshare.com/articles/ item/mission-statement-and-core-beliefs

Figshare. (n.d.). About us. Available at: https://Figshare. com/about

Hahnel, M. (2013). Open data: We need to share research results, even when they are wrong. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/ higher-education-network /blog/2013/oct/08/openresearch- data-science-papers

Hahnel, M. (2015). The importance of Institutional APIs. In: Figshare blog. Available at: https://Figshare.com/ blog/The_importance_of_Institutional_APIs/155.

Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media+ Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080

Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., and Peters, I. (2015). Research data explored II: The anatomy and reception of Figshare. arXiv preprint arXiv. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1503.01298

Leach-Murray, S. (2016). Figshare-Get credit for your research: Figshare.com. Technical Services Quarterly, 33(1), 98-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.10 93855

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Available at: www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf

Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., and Edwards, P. N. (2018). Re-integrating scholarly infrastructure: The ambiguous role of data sharing platforms. Big Data and Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756683

Reed, R. B. (2016). Figshare for Institutions. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(4), 376- 378. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.031 PMCid:PMC5079514

Ribes, D., and Finholt, T. A. (2009). The long now of infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development, 10(5); 375-398. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/557392 https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00199

Ruppert, E. (2015). Doing the transparent state: Open government data as performance indicators. Available at: https:// research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/13490/1/Ruppert2015.pdf https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091265.006

Saeed, S., and Ali, P. M. (2019). Research data management and data sharing among research scholars of life sciences and social sciences. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(6). https://doi. org/10.14429/djlit.39.06.14997 25. Scherer, D., and Valen, D. (2019). Balancing multiple roles

of repositories: Developing a comprehensive repository at Carnegie Mellon University. Publications, 7(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020030

Singh, J. (2011). Figshare. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 2(2), 138-138. Available at: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A259818787/AONE? u=anon~185b59f1&sid=googleScholar&xid=05f40a83 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.81919 PMid:21772785 PMCid:PMC3127351

Splawa-Neyman, P. (2018). Figshare. Available at: https//Figshare.com/blog/Figshare_as_a_data_repository/ 410

Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2016). Figshare: A universal repository for academic resource sharing? Online Information Review, 40(3), 333-346. https://doi. org/10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0190

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Wani, Z. A., & Bhat, A. (2022). Figshare: A One-Stop Shop for Research Data Management with Diverse Features and Services. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 59(6), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i6/170789