Social Media Mobilization and Advocacy: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2024/v61i2/171307Keywords:
Advocacy, Digital Activism, Ethical Guidelines, Hashtag Activism, Justice, Mohbad, Social MediaAbstract
This case study investigates the role of social media mobilization and advocacy in the quest for justice for Mohbad, an influential Nigerian whose death sparked rumours of foul play involving friends and relatives. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, data was collected through surveys administered to students of Taraba State University, Jalingo, and content analysis of qualitative data. Findings reveal positive perceptions towards social media mobilization, emphasizing the influence of social media influencers and hashtag activism. Challenges such as misinformation and algorithmic biases were identified, highlighting the need for ethical guidelines and responsible engagement in online advocacy. Recommendations include enhancing digital literacy, fostering collaborative partnerships, promoting responsible hashtag activism, and establishing ethical guidelines for digital advocacy.
Downloads
References
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons. https:// doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-091
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780190696726.001.0001 PMCid:PMC9351054
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. MIT Press. https://doi. org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001
Gillmor, D. (2004). We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. O’Reilly Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1012807.1012808
Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2016). Celebrity and activism on social media. Celebrity Studies, 7(3), 311-314.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0021
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin, UK. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Information and Knowledge

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.