Current Trends in Webometrics Research


  • Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006
  • Government First Grade College, Periyapatna



Webometrics, Research Impact, Web.2.0, Social Web, Big Data.


Webometrics is the quantitative analysis of Web phenomena. The growth of Web technologies has opened new avenues for Web researchers for measurement and analyses of the phenomenon. Webometrics is traditionally used for quantifying Web data related to footprints of researchers or institutions on the Web measured in terms of their research publications and other parameters. The paper looks at the recent developments in webometrics research in light of emergence of social Web and big data, and their applications in new research fronts and future perspective of webometrics research. The paper also discusses about the recent developments in research techniques in webometrics such as query splitting and virtual memetics in the social network sites. It is observed that the growth of Web technologies has possibly posed new challenges for traditional citation databases which have been extensively used so far for measuring research impact of universities, institutions or individual researchers. The new trend has shown that impact measures are in the verge of acceptance as new method for measurement of academic and research contributions. One notable example for this is altmetrics. In the nutshell the paper gives an overview of the emerging trends and impact measuring techniques used in webometrics research.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Almind, T.C. and Ingwersen, P. (1997) Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological

approaches to 'Webometrics'. Journal of Documentation, 53(4): 404-426.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2004) Use of search engines in information science research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38: 231-288.

Bar-ilan, J.; Haustein, S.; Peters, I.; Priem, J.; Shema, H. and Terliesner, J. (2012, September 5-8) Beyond citations: Scholars‘ visibility on the social Web. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from

Björneborn, L. and Ingwersen, P. (2004) Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science andTechnology, 55(14): 1216-1227.

Hood, W.H. and Wilson, C.S. (2001) The literature of biblometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2): 291-314.

Ingwersen, P. (1998) The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2): 236-243.

Koehler, W. (2002) Web page change and persistence - a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2): 162-171.

Koelher, W. (2004) A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: A consideration of document persistence. Information Research, 9(2). Retrieved from

Konkiel, S. (2013) Altmetrics: A 21st-century solution to determining research quality. Online Researcher, July/August Issue. Retrieved from Solution-to-Determining-Research-Quality-90551.shtml

Kousha, K. (2005) Webometrics and scholarly communication: An overview. Quarterly Journal of the National Library of Iran (Faslenameh Ketab), 14(4): 7-16.

Kousha, K. and Thelwall, M. (2007) Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multidiscipline exploratory analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7): 1055-1065.

Kousha, K., and Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273-294.

Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M. and Abdoli, M. (2012) The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9): 1710–1727.

Metayer, E. (2010) Tapping into the invisible Web for competitive intelligence. Competia. Retrieved from

Pritchard, A. (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4): 348-349.

Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J. and Thelwall, M. (2012) Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLOS ONE 7(5). Retrieved from 0035869

Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. (1992) An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing and Management, 28: 1- 3.

Thelwall, M. (2007) Blog searching: The first general-purpose source of retrospective public opinion in the social sciences? Online Information Review, 31(3): 277-289.

Thelwall, M. and Stuart, D. (2007) RUOK? Communication technologies blogged during a crisis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(9).

Thelwall, M. (2009) Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative Web research for the social sciences. New York: Morgan and Claypool.

Thelwall, M. (2012) Webometrics and social Web research methods. Retrieved from uk/~cm1993/mtpublications.html#Webometrics

Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K. and Paltoglou, G. (2012) Sentiment strength detection for the social Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1): 163-173.

Thelwall, M. (2010) Webometrics: Emerged or doomed? Information Research, 15(4). Retrieved from

Thelwall, M. (2012) A history of webometrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(2). Retrieved from

Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L. and Björneborn, L (2005) Webometrics. In Cronin, B. (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 39: 81-135

Vaughan, L. and Shaw, D. (2003) Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(4): 1313-1324.

Wilkinson, D. and Thelwall, M. (2012) Trending Twitter topics in English: An international comparison. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8): 1631-1646.



How to Cite

Harinarayana, N. S., & Vasantha Raju, N. (2013). Current Trends in Webometrics Research. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 50(5), 657–665.



Received 2013-12-26
Accepted 2013-12-26
Published 2013-10-14