Reordering Ranganathan: Shifting User Behaviours, Shifting Priorities

Authors

  • Lynn Silipigni Connaway
     OCLC Research, OCLC, Dublin, Ohio
  • Ixchel M. Faniel
     OCLC Research, OCLC, Dublin, Ohio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2015/v52i1/57547

Keywords:

Digital Environment, Five Laws of Library Science, Information Seeking Behaviour, Information Services, Web- Based Information Services.

Abstract

S.R. Ranganathan's Five Laws of Library Science provide a broad framework for designing and evaluating library programmes, activities and services. The laws continue to be extensively cited even today suggesting their continued relevance. This paper attempts to interpret the five laws in the present day context of information abundance, digital revolution, currently available resources and services, and user behaviours. The idea has been to suggest how libraries and librarians can better connect to those behaviours. After examining the changing roles of the Five Laws on the basis of findings of recent research, the paper suggests reordering and reframing of the Five Laws of Library Science. A number of recommendations for realizing the intent of the laws have also been made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aitcheson, K. (2009). Standards and guidance in archaeological archiving: The work of the archaeological archives forum and the institute for archaeologists. The Grey Journal, 5(2): 67–71. Retrieved from: http://www.greynet.org/ images/Contents_TGJ.V5.N2.pdf

Alves, J. (2013). Unintentional knowledge: What we find when we’re not looking. The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review (June 23). Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/article/UnintentionalKnowledge/139891/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm;_medium=en

Auckland, M. (2012). Re-skilling for Research. London: Research Information Network. Retrieved from: http:// www.rluk.ac.uk/files/RLUK Re-skilling.pdf

Barner, K. (2011). The library is a growing organism: Ranganathan’s Fifth Law of library science and the academiclibrary in the digital era. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from: http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/barner.htm

Beetham, H; McGill L; Littlejohn, A. (2009). Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA Project). Glasgow: The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University. Retrieved from: http:// www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/llida/LLiDAReportJune2009.pdf

Bhatt, R.K. (2011). Relevance of Ranganathan’s Laws of Library Science in library marketing. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from: http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/ bhatt.htm

Blanchard, O. (2006). The Continuing Shift from ‘Market Share’ to ‘Attention Share’. Corante. Retrieved from: http:// marketing.corante.com/editorial/archives/2006/09/post_5.php

Brown, A.; Perrin, K. (2000). A model for the description of archaeological archives. Forth Cumberland: English Heritage Centre for Archaeology. Retrieved from: http:// www.eng-h.gov.uk/archives/archdesc.pdf

Brown, D.H. (2007). Archaeological archives: A guide to best practice in creation, compilation, transfer and curation. n.p.: Archaeological Archives Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.archaeologyuk.org/archives/

Calhoun, K; Cantrell, J; Gallagher, P; Hawk, J. (2009). Online catalogs: What users and librarians want: An OCLC report, OCLC, Dublin.

Carlson, S; Anderson, B (2007). What are data? The many kinds of data and their implications for data re-use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2): 635–661. Do i:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00342.

Carr, P.L. (2014). Reimagining the Library as a Technology: An Analysis of Ranganathan’s Five Laws of Library Science within the Social Construction of Technology Framework. Library Quarterly, 84(2): 152–164.

Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (2008). Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future: A CIBER Briefing Paper. London: CIBER, 2008.

Choudhury, G.S. (2008). Case study in data curation at John Hopkins University. Library Trends, 57(2): 211–220.

Choudury, G.S. (2010). Data curation: An ecological perspective. College & Research Libraries News, 71: 194–196.

Cloonan, M.V. and Dove, J.G. (2005). Ranganathan online: Do digital libraries violate the Third Law? Library Journal, 130(6): 58–60.

Connaway, L.S, Radford, M.L. (2007). Service sea change: Clicking with screenagers through virtual reference. In Sailing into the future: Charting our destiny: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, March-April 2007, Baltimore, edited by Hugh A. Thompson. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2007/ connaway-acrl.pdf

Connaway, L.S; Radford, M.L. (2011). Seeking synchronicity: Revelations and recommendations for virtual reference, OCLC Research. Dublin. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/reports/synchronicity/full.pdf

Connaway, L.S.; Wakeling, S. (2012). To Use or Not to Use WorldCat.org: An International Perspective from Different User Groups, Unpublished report, 26 April 2012.

Connaway, L.S. and Dickey, T.J. (2010a). The digital information seeker: Report of findings from selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC user behavior projects, Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). Retrieved from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/ 2010/ digitalinformationseekerreport.pdf

Connaway, L.S. and Dickey, T.J. (2010b). Towards a profile of the researcher of today: What can we learn from JISC Projects? Common themes identified in an analysis of JISC virtual research environment and digital repository projects. Retrieved from: http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/418/2/ VirtualScholar_themesFromProjects_revised.pdf

Connaway, L.S.; Prabha, C. and Dickey, T.J. (2006). Sensemaking the information confluence: The whys and hows of college and university user satisfying of information needs. Phase III: Focus group interview study. Report on National Leadership Grant LG-02-03-0062-03, Institute of Museum and Library Services, Washington. Columbus: School of Communication, The Ohio State University.

Connaway, L.S.; White, D.; Lanclos, D.; Le Cornu, A. (2013). Visitors and Residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Information Research, 18(1). Retrieved from: http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/infres181.html

Connaway, L.S.; Lanclos, D.M. and Hood, E.M. (2013a). I always stick with the first thing that comes up on Google … Where people go for information, what they use, and why. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from: http:// www.educause.edu/ero/article/i-always-stick-first-thingcomesgooglewhere-people-go-information-what-theyuse-and-why

Connaway, L.S.; Lanclos, D.M. and Hood, Erin, M. (2013b). I find Google a lot easier than going to the library website. Imagine ways to innovate and inspire students to use the academic library. In Proceedings of the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) 2013 conference, Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries, 10–13 April, Indianapolis. pp. 293. Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/ confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/Connaway_Google.pdf

Connaway, L.S.; Lanclos, D.M.; White, D.; Le Cornu, A. and Hood, E.M. (2013). User-centered decision making: A new model for developing academic library services and systems. IFLA Journal, 39(1): 30–36.

Connaway, L.S.; Radford M.L.; Dickey, T.J.; De Angelis, JW. and Confer, P. (2008). Sense-making and Synchronicity: Information-seeking Behaviors of Millennials and Baby Boomers. Libr, 58(2): 123–135. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/publications/library/ 2008/connaway-libri.pdf

Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.; Radford, M.L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3): 179–190. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/ library/2011/connaway-lisr.pdf.

Connaway, L.S. (2008). Make room for the Millennials. NextSpace. 10: 18-19. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/ nextspace/010/research.htm

Connaway, L.S. (2013a). Findings from user behavior studies: A user’s world. ALA Midwinter Meeting and Exhibits, 28 January 2013, Seattle.

Connaway, L.S. (2013b). Why the internet is more attractive than the library. The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4): 41–56.

Consortium of University Research Libraries and Research Information Network (2007). Researchers, 39.

De Belder, K. (2012). Session 1: Directly supporting researchers. Libraries rebound: Embracing mission, maximizing impact, 5-6 June, Philadelphia. Retrieved from: https:// www.youtube.com/ watch?v=R9qUoVSD7HA&feature=y outu.be

De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L. and Wilson, A. (2005). Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin.

De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Hawk, J. and Wilson, A. (2006). College students’ perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin.

De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Carlson, M.; Gallagher, P.; Hawk, J. and Sturtz, C. (2010). Perceptions of libraries, 2010: Context and community. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin.

De Rosa, C. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin.

Delserone, L.M. (2008). At the watershed: Preparing for research data management and stewardship at the University of Minnesota Libraries. Library Trends, 57(2): 202–210.

Dempsey, L. (2008). Always On: Libraries in a World of Permanent connectivity. First Monday, 14(1). Retrieved from: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/ index.php/fm/article/view/2291/207.

Dempsey, L. (2012). Thirteen ways of looking at libraries, discovery, and the catalog: Scale, workflow, attention. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/thirteen-ways-looking-librariesdiscoveryand-catalog-scale-workflow-attention

Dennis, S.P. (2011). Share of Attention. Steve Dennis’ Blog: Zen and the Art & Science of Customercentricity. Retrieved from: http://stevenpdennis.com/2011/06/09/share-ofattention2/

DeSantis, N. (2012). On Facebook, librarian brings 2 students from the early 1900s to life. Wired Campus. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/ on-facebook-librarian-brings-twostudents-from-the-early1900s-to-life/34845

Elder, D; Westbrook, R.N. and Reilly, M. (2012). Wikipedia lover, not a hater: Harnessing Wikipedia to increase the discoverability of library resources. Journal of Web Librarianship, 6(1): 32–44. DOI:10.1080/19322909.2012.641808.

Faniel, I.M. (2009). Unrealized potential: The socio-technical challenges of a large scale cyberinfrastructure initiative. National Science Foundation, Arlington. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61845

Faniel, I.M.; Kriesberg, A. and Yakel, E. (2012). Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists. The annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 26–31October, Baltimore.

Faniel, I.M. and Jacobsen, TE. (2010). Reusing scientific data: How earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues’ data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 19(3-4): 355–375.

Faniel, I.; Kansa, E.; Kansa, S.W.; Barrera-Gomez, J. and Yakel, E. (2013). The challenges of digging data: A study of context in archaeological data reuse. JCDL 2013 Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM, New York, pp. 295–304. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467712

Fast, K.V.; Campbell, D.G. (2004). I still like Google: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web. In Proceedings of the ASIS&T Annual Meeting. 41: 138–146.

Fisher, E. (2012). Makerspaces move into academic libraries. ACRL Tech Connect. Retrieved from: http://acrl.ala.org/ techconnect/?p=2340

Gabridge, T. (2009). The Last Mile: Liaison Roles in Curating Science and Engineering Research Data. Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 265: 15–21. Retrieved from: http://www.arl.org/ bm~doc/rli-265-gabridge.pdf

Glassmeyer, S. (2010). Ranganathan 2.0. AALL Spectrum, 14(3): 22–24.

Goldup, S.J. (2010). Public libraries in the digital age: Investing the implementation of Ranganathan’s Five Laws of library science in physical and online library services. School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington, February 2010.

Gorman, M. (1995). Five new laws of librarianship. American Libraries, 26(8): 784–785.

Gorman, M. (1998). The five laws of library science: Then and now. Excerpt of Our singular strengths by Michael Gorman. School Library Journal, 7: 20–23.

HathiTrust. (2014). Statistics Information. Hathi Trust Digital Library. Retrieved on May 28, 2014 from http:// www.hathitrust.org/statistics_info

Head, A.J. and Eisenberg, M.B. (2009). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. The Information School, University of Washington. Retrieved from: http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_fall2009_finalv_ yr1_12_2009v2.pdf

Head, A.J. and Eisenberg, M.B. (2010). How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy progress report, The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle.

Hiebert, J. and Theriault, S. (2012). BLASTing the zombies! Creative ideas to fight finals fatigue. College and Research Libraries News, 73(9): 540–569.

Holdren, J.P. (2013). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf

Institute for Archaeologists. (2009). Standard and guidance for the creation, compilation, transfer and deposition of archaeological archives. n.p.: Institute for Archaeologists. Retrieved from: http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/ files/node-files/Archives2009.pdf

Jahnke, L.; Asher, A.; Keralis, S.D.C. (2012). The Problem of Data. With an introduction by Charles Henry, Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2012.

Johnston, L. and Hanson, C. (2010). e-Science at the University of Minnesota: A collaborative approach. In International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries, 31st Annual Conference. Retrieved from: http:// docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/3

Kearns, A.J. (2012). Slam the Boards! Predatory Reference and the Online Answer Sites. OCLC Webjunction. Retrieved from: http://www.webjunction.org/documents/ webjunction/Slam_the_Boards_Predatory_Reference_ and_the_Online_Answer_Sites.html

Kwanya, T.; Stilwell, C.; Underwood, P.G. (2010). Library 2.0 Principles and Ranganathan’s Fifth Law. Mousaion, 28(2): 1–16.

Lage, K.; Losoff, B. and Maness, J. (2011). Receptivity to library involvement in scientific data curation: A case study at the University of Colorado Boulder. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4): 915–937.

Lally, A.M. and Dunford, C.E. (2007). Using Wikipedia to extend digital collections. D-Lib Magazine, 13(5/6). Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/lally/05lally.html

Lavoie, B.; Childress, E.; Erway, R.; Faniel, I.; Malpas C.; Schaffner, J. and van der Werf, T. (2014). The Evolving Scholarly Record. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research, 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/ library/2014/oclcresearch-evolving-scholarly-record-2014.pdf

Lippincott, J.K. (2010). A mobile future for academic libraries. Reference Services Review, 38(2): 205–213.

Lippincott, JK. and Duckett K. (2013). Library space assessment: Focusing on learning. Research Library Issues: A Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 284: 12–21. Retrieved from: http://publications.arl.org/rli284/

Luce, R.E. (2008). A New Value Equation Challenge: The Emergence of eResearch and Roles for Research Libraries. In No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.

National Science Foundation. (2006). To Stand the Test of Time: Long-term Stewardship of Digital Datasets in Science and Engineering. A Report to the National Science Foundation from the ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe. National Science Foundation, Arlington, 2006. Retrieved from: http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/digdatarpt.pdf

Nelson, B. (2009). Data sharing: Empty archives. Nature, 461(7261): 160–163. Retrieved from: http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090909/pdf/461160a.pdf

Newton, MP.; Miller, C.C. and Marianne, S.B. (2010). Librarian roles in institutional repository data set collecting: Outcomes of a research library task force. Collection Management, 36(1): 53–67. Doi: 10.1080/01462679.2011.530546.

Noruzi, A. (2004). Application of Ranganathan’s Laws to the Web. Webology, 1(2). Retrieved from: http://www.webology.org/2004/v1n2/a8.html.

Oblinger, D.G. and Oblinger, J.L. eds. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder:EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?PAGE_ ID=5989&bhcp=1

Parks Canada. (2005). Archaeological recording manual: Excavations and surveys. n.p.: Parks Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/docs/pc/guide/fp-es/titretitle.aspx

Peters, C and Dryden, A.R. (2011). Assessing the academic library’s role in campus-wide research data management: A first step at the University of Houston. Science & Technology Libraries, 30(4): 387–403. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0194262X.2011.626340

Pierard, C and Lee, N. (2011). Studying space: Improving space planning with user studies. Journal of Access Services, 8: 190–207. Doi:10.1080/15367967.2011.602258.

Popova, M. (2011). Accessibility vs. Access: How the Rhetoric of ‘Rare’ is Changing in the Age of Information Abundance. Nieman Journalism Lab (August 23, 2011), Retrieved from: http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/08/accessibilityvs-access-how-the-rhetoric-of-rare-is-changing-intheage-ofinformation-abundance/

Prabha, C.; Connaway, L.S. and Dickey, T.J. (2006). Sensemaking the information confluence: The whys and hows of college and university user satisficing of information needs. Phase IV: Semi-structured interview study. Report on National Leadership Grant LG-02-03-0062-03, to Institute of Museum and Library Services, The Ohio State University, Washington, DC. Columbus, OH: School of Communication.

Pullinger, D. (1999). Academics and the new information environment: The impact of local factors on use of electronic journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(2): 164–172.

Purcell, K.; Rainie, L.; Heaps, A.; Buchanan, J.; Friedrich, L.; Jacklin, A.; Chen, C.; and Zickuhr, K. (2012). How teens do research in the digital world. Washington DC: PEWInternet & American Life Project. Retrieved from: http:// pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Student-Research.aspx

Radford, M.L. and Connaway, L.S. (2008). Seeking synchronicity: Evaluating virtual reference services from user, non-user and librarian perspectives: IMLS final performance report. Report on Grant LG-06-05-0109-05, Institute of Museum and Library Services, Washington, DC. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.

Ranganathan, S.R. (1931). The five laws of library science. London: Edward Goldston, Ltd., 313.

Research Information Network. (2006). Researchers and discovery services: Behaviour, perceptions and needs. London: Research Information Network, p5.

Research Information Network. (2008). To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. London: Research Information Network.

Rolland, B. and Lee, C.P. (2013). Beyond trust and reliability: Reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research. In Collaboration and sharing in scientific work, New York: ACM. pp. 435–444.

Rubin, R.E. (2004). Foundations of Library and Information Science. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 251.

Sadler, S. (2012). Session 3: Exploiting space as a distinctive asset. Presented at Libraries rebound: Embracing mission, maximizing impact, June 5-6, in Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmEtdVPro54& feature=youtu.be

Salo, D. (2008). Innkeeper at the roach motel. Library Trends, 57(2): 98–123.

Savolainen, R. (1993). The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 29(1): 13–28.

Scaramozzino, J.M.; Ramirez, M.L. and McGaughey, K.J. (2012). A study of faculty data curation behaviors and attitudes at a teaching-centered university. College and Research Libraries. 73(4): 349–365. Retrieved from: http:// crl.acrl.org/content/73/4/349.full.pdf+html

Simon, H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man: Social and rational. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Smith, A. (2014). 6 New Facts About Facebook. Fact Tank (February 3, 2014), Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/03/6-new-facts-aboutfacebook/

Soehner, C.; Steeves, C. and Ward, J. (2010). e-Science and data support services: A study of ARL member institutions, Retrieved from: http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/escience_report2010.pdf

Sweeney, R. (2006). Millennial behaviors and demographics. 3. Retrieved from: http://certi.mst.edu/media/administrative/ certi/documents/Article-Millennial-Behaviors.pdf

Szajewski, M. (2013). Using Wikipedia to enhance the visibility of digitized archival assets. D-Lib Magazine, 19(3/4). Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/ szajewski/03szajewski.html

Tenopir, C.; Birch, B. and Allard, S. (2012). Academic libraries and research data services: Current practices and plans for the future. An ACRL white paper. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Van House, N.A.; Butler, M.H. and Schiff, Lisa R. (1998). Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA: ACM. pp. 335–43. Doi:10.1145/289444.289508.

Van House, N. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology. A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 16(1): 99. Doi:10.1080/02691720210132833.

Van Scoyoc, A.M. and Caroline, C. (2006). The electronic academic library: Undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1): 47–58.

Walter, S. (2012). Ranganathan redux: The “Five Laws” and the future of college and research libraries. College and Research Libraries, 73(3): 213–215.

Walter, V.A. and Mediavilla, C. (2005). Teens are from Neptune, librarians are from Pluto: An analysis of online reference transactions. Library Trends. 54(2): 209–227.

Walters, T. and Ruttenberg, J. (2014). Shared Access Research Ecosystem. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 49(2): 56–57. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/ shared-access-researchecosystem.

Warwick, C.; Galina, I.; Terras, M.; Huntington, P. and Pappa, N. (2008). The Master Builders: LAIRAH Research on Good Practice in the Construction of Digital Humanities Projects. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3): 383–396. Retrieved from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/13810/.

White, D. (2011). The learning black market. TALL Blog (September 30), Retrieved from: http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2011/09/30/the-learning-black-market/

Witt, M.; Carlson, J.; Brandt, D.S. and Cragin, M. (2009). Constructing data curation profiles. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(3): 93–103.

Wong, W.; Stelmaszewska, H.; Barn, B.; Bhimani, N. and Barn, S. (2009). JISC user behaviour observational study: User behaviour in resource discovery. Final report. Retrieved from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/programmerelated/ 2010/ubirdfinalreport.aspx

Yep, J. and Shulman, J. (2014). Analyzing the Library’s Twitter Network: Using NodeXL to Visualize Impact. College and Research Library News, 75(4): 177–186.

Zickuhr, K.; Rainie, L. and Purcell, K. (2013). Library services in the digital age. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from: http://libraries.pewinternet.org/files/legacy-pdf/PIP_Library% 20services_Report.pdf

Zimmerman, A.S. (2008). New knowledge from old data: The role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(5): 631–652. Doi:10.1177/0162243907306704.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-01

How to Cite

Connaway, L. S., & Faniel, I. M. (2015). Reordering Ranganathan: Shifting User Behaviours, Shifting Priorities. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 52(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2015/v52i1/57547

Issue

Volume 52, Issue 1, February 2015

Section

Articles

License

All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Received 2015-01-30
Accepted 2015-01-30
Published 2015-02-01