From Citation to Keyword Search: How Digitization Transformed the Legal Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2015/v52i3/70332Keywords:
Digitization, Keyword Search, Legal Research.Abstract
The Article Seeks to Examine Whether Digitization has made Legal Research Faster whereby it Leads to Greater Availability of Updated Information. it Goes on to Describe some of the Practical Limitations of Digitization. and also Narrates the Advantages of Digitization in the Light of Inter Disciplinary Works. in the Conclusion the Author has Examined the Breadth Versus Depth of Legal Research.Downloads
References
Dickerson, C. (2011). Supreme court closing regional law libraries. The West Virginia Record, Retrieved on 18 February 2015 from <http://www.wvrecord.com/news/235779supreme-court closing-regional-law-libraries>.
Barger, M.C. (2002). On the internet, nobody knows you’re a Judge: Federal Appellate Courts’ use of internet sites. Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, 417.
Wayne, V.E. and Paul, J.L. (2005). Book lovers beware - a survey of online research habits of stanford law students. Robert Crown Law Library Legal Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 24: 12.
Bravy, J.; Gary J. and Feather, K.C. (2001). The impact of electronic access on basic library services: one academic law library’s experience. Law Library Journal, 93(2): 261, 267.
Jones, S. The Internet Goes to College: How Students are Living in the Future with Today’s Technology. Retrieved on 18 February 2015 from <http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ ED472669.pdf>.
Anonymous, Questionnaire Survey & Interview.
Jones, S. The internet goes to college: how students are living in the future with today’s technology. Retrieved on 18 February 2015 from <http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ ED472669.pdf>.
Hanson, F.A. (2002). From key numbers to keywords: how automation has transformed the Law. Law Library Journal, 94(4): 563, 576.
Interview with Librarian.
Hanson, F.A. (2002). From key numbers to keywords: how automation has transformed the Law. Law Library Journal, 94(4): 575.
Price, M.O. and Bitner H. Effective legal research: a practice manual on law books and their use (New York, Prentice Hall Inc., 1953) as cited in Jason Wilson “What to Look for in a Law Book”. Retrieved on 18 February 2015 from <http://www.jasnwilsn.com/2010/11/06/what-to-look-forina-law-book/ >.
Gallacher, I. (2006). Forty-two: the hitchhiker’s guide to teaching legal research to the google generation. 39 Akron Law Review. Kron Law Review, 151: 182.
Robert, C.B. (2012). Legal research and legal concepts: where form molds substance. California Law Review, 15: 26–27.
Julie, M.J. (2009). Not just numbers and keywords anymore: how user interface design affects legal research. Law Library Journal, 7, 8.
Peoples, L.F. (2005). The death of the digest and the pitfalls of electronic research: what is the modern legal researcher to do?. Law Library Journal, 97: 661,678.
Berring, R.C. (2012). Legal research and legal concepts: where form molds substance. California Law Review, 12.
Claire, M.G. (2007). Legal information management in a global and digital age: revolution and tradition. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper, 10-11: 23–24.
Hanson, F.A. (2002). From key numbers to keywords: how automation has transformed the Law. Law Library Journal, 94(4): 577.
Shah, S. (2012). Taller, stronger, sharper - the impact of digitization of legal research. Bangalore: NLSIU.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2015-05-25
Published 2015-06-01