The Relevance of Communities of Practice (Cop) in University Libraries: A Knowledge Management Perspective

Authors

  • Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 695034
  • Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 695034

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2016/v53i5/91105

Keywords:

Communities of Practice, Higher Education, Information Management, Knowledge Management, University Libraries.

Abstract

In a knowledge based economy, Knowledge Management (KM) activities are significant in University Libraries for their competitiveness and self sustainability. This paper takes a look at the present status of University Libraries and brings out some of the KM practices followed in the libraries of major technology enterprises like Hewlett Packard (HP) and Microsoft. It asserts the need of Communities of Practice (CoP) in the libraries of universities, as a tool of knowledge creation process for the academic knowledge management strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

E. Eldho Joy, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 695034

Sr.Technical Assistant

Kerala University Libray

Thiruvananthapuram.

References

ACRL (2016). Retrieved from

http://www.ala.org/acrl/ aboutacrl/directoryofleadership/communitiespractice/copa

Alwin, I. Goldman (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001

Amin, A, and Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond Communities of Practice. Research Policy, 37:353-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003

Brenda Bailey-Hainer and Rick B. Forsman (2005). Redefining the future of academic libraries:when the definition of ‘public good’ changes. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6):503-05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.09.002

Broadbent, M. (1997). The Emerging phenomenon of knowledge management. Australian Library Journal, 46:6-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1997.10755782

Chris Kimble and Paul Hildreth (2005). Dualities, distributed Communities of Practice and Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 9:102-113. doi:10/1108/13673270510610369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510610369

Elayne Coakes and Steve Clarke (2006). The concept of Communities of Practice. In: Encyclopaedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management, Elayne Coakes (Ed.) and Steve Clarke, Hershey, PA92-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-556-6.ch019

Foucault, M. (1977). Fantacies of the Library in Language, Counter Memory, Practice. Donald F. Bouchard (Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.

Jong-Ae Kim (2015). Integrating Communities of Practice into Library Services. Collaborative Librarianship, 7:47-55. Creative Commons.

Kristin J. Henrich and Ramirose Attebury (2010). Communities of Practice at an Academic Library: A New Approach to mentoring at the University of Idaho. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36:158-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.007

Lave, J. and Wenger. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lambiotte, R and Panzarasa, P (2009). Communities, knowledge creation and information diffusion. Journal of Infometrics, 3:180-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.007

Nicole Nistor and Frank Fischer (2012). Communities of practice in academia: Testing a qualitative model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1:114-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.05.005

Nora F Belzowski, J. Parker Ladwig, Thurston Miller (2013). Crafting identity, collaboration, and Relevance for Academic Libraries Using Communities of Practice. Collaborative Librarianship, 1:3-15. Creative Commons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29087/2013.5.1.04

Popper, K.R. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. rev. ed. Oxford University Press.

Powis, C. (2004). Developing the academic librarian as learning facilitator in M. Oldroyd(Ed.) Developing Academic Library Staff For Future Success. London: Facet.

Ranganathan S. R (2006). The Five Laws of Library Science. Ess Ess Publications.

Scarso, E. et.al. (2009). A systematic framework for analysing the critical success factors of communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management , 13:431-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997105

Shukriah Binti Hj Yon and Geeta Albert (2013). Developing library professionals: the influence of Communities of Practice. IFLA WLIC 2013. Singapore.

Sidorko, Peter E and Yang, Tina T. (2011). Knowledge exchange and community engagement: an academic library perspective. Library Management, 32:385-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111158538

Smith, A. and McKeen. (2003). Creating and facilitating communities of practice in Holsapple, C.W. (Ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management. Berlin: 1:393-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_20

Susan Hurst (2013). Current trends in UK University libraries. New Library World. 114:398-407. DOI: 1108/NLW-042013-0032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-04-2013-0032

Swan, J. Swan, Newell and Robertson (2000). Limits of IT driven knowledge management initiatives for interactive innovation process:toward a community based approach. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926597

Wenger, E. and Snyder. (2000). Communities of Practice: the Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review,139-45.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Published

2016-11-30

How to Cite

Eldho Joy, E., & Vijayakumar, K. P. (2016). The Relevance of Communities of Practice (Cop) in University Libraries: A Knowledge Management Perspective. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 53(5), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2016/v53i5/91105

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-04-12
Accepted 2016-11-04
Published 2016-11-30