Webometrics Ranking (WR) of World Universities and National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF): A Comparative Study
Authors
-
Department of Library and Information Science, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli - 627012, Tamil Nadu
Sankha Subhra Das -
Department of Library and Information Science, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli - 627012, Tamil NaduP. Balasubramanian
-
Department of Library and Information Science, Rabindra Bharathi University, Kolkata - 700050Arpita Roy Chowdhury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2019/v56i3/144386Keywords:
Excellence Rank, National Institutional Ranking Framework, Parameters, Rankings, Webometrics Ranking, Web PresenceAbstract
Ranking institutions of a country, continent or the entire world is not an easy task. However, there are certain agencies that regularly undertake such an exercise. In this paper we have considered Webometrics Ranking (WR) and National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) specific to India for our study. Various parameters have been compared citing their features. The methodology used by these rankings have been discussed such as WR depends on web presence and categorises institutions on the basis of Presence rank, Impact rank, Openness rank and Excellence rank whereas NIRF categorises on the basis of Graduation Outcomes, Learning Teaching & Resources, Outreach of students, Research and Professional Practice and Awareness. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Maharashtra tops the list in Webometrics Rankings whereas Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai tops the list in NIRF rankings. An interpretation of these rankings along with their limitations have been given finally some conclusions have been drawn on the basis of the data.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aguillo, I.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M. & Ortega, J. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics. 85: 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0190-z.
Cothey V., Aguillo I.F. and Arroyo N. (2006). Operationalising “Websites”: Lexically, semantically or topologically? Cybermetrics, 10(1). Paper 4. http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v10i1p4.pdf.
http://www.webometrics.info/en. Accessed on 21-04-2019.
https://www.nirfindia.org/. Accessed on 23-04-2019.
Kretschmer, H. and Aguillo, I.F. (2005). New indicators for gender studies in Web networks. Information Processing and Management, 41(6):1481-1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.009.
Ortega, J.L., Aguillo, I.F. and Prieto, J.A. (2006). Longitudinal study of contents and elements in the scientific web environment. Journal of Information Science, 32(4):344-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506065785.
Ruiz, F., Nunez, T. and Samira, E.G. (2018). Evaluating university performance using reference point based composite indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 12. 1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.003.
Wouters, P., Reddy, C. and Aguillo, I.F. (2006). On the visibility of information on the Web: An exploratory experimental approach. Research Evaluation, 15(2):107-115. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775931.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2019-06-20
Published 2019-06-24
