Relative worth of Factors Affecting Acquisition in Libraries of Higher Educational Institutions
Authors
-
Department of Library and Information Sciences, Assam University, Silchar – 788011
Nirnimesh Pandiya -
Department of Library and Information Sciences, Assam University, Silchar – 788011Manoj Kumar Sinha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2021/v58i1/152090Keywords:
Acquisition Factors, Academic Libraries, Acquisition Policy, Indian Libraries, Library Acquisition.Abstract
New e-resources are believed to affect preferences of readers and hence acquisition policy of libraries in general and preference for resources in particular need to be tuned accordingly. The paper reports a study undertaken to determine priorities of factors and their components in library acquisition. The literature review has been done by searching in Emerald, Taylor and Francis and Web of Science using PRISMA protocol to understand the past research in this direction. A closedended structured questionnaire designed for the purpose with factors and their components of acquisition, pilot-tested and used for collection of primary data from library professionals of selected institutions of higher education governed and funded by Government of India. The data so collected was analyzed using SPSS 23 to determine and prioritize the factors and their components based on mean scores. The study concluded that policy makers need to focus more on the high ranked factors and their components of acquisition for cost-efficiency, cost-effectiveness and better service to the intended users.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 64−73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110.
Ganson, J. and Dye, J. (2006). Library collection development policies: Academic, public, and special libraries, Reference and User Services Quarterly, 45(3), 267 pp.
Holden, J. (2010). Acquisitions in the New Information Universe: Core Competencies and Ethical Practices, Neal Schuman Publishers, New York, NY.
Holloway, K. L. (2003). Developing core and mastery-level competencies for librarians, Library Administration and Management, 17(2): 94-98.
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1978). Psychom Etric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sa’nchez Vignau, B. S. (1999). Conferencias de la Asignatura Desarrollo de Colecciones, University of Havana, Havana; 5 pp.
Thompson, S. and Sharp, S. (2009). E-books in academic libraries: Lessons learned and new challenges, Serials, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1629/22136.
Tjoumas, R. (1993). Native American literature for young people: A survey of collection development methods in public libraries, Library Trends, 41(3): 493-523
van Zijl, C. (1998). The why, what, and how of collection development policies, South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 66(3), 99 pp. https://doi.org/10.7553/66-3-1438.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2021-02-05
Published 2021-02-25
