‘Like, Comment, Share’: Impact of Social Media Tools on Research
Authors
-
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Chennai − 600005, Tamil Nadu
V. Jenita Shiloh -
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Chennai − 600005, Tamil NaduH. Fazlunnisa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2022/v59i2/168034Keywords:
Impact, Research Output, Social Networking Tools, Social Media, User Awareness, UsageAbstract
The study investigates the usage pattern and preference of social media tools among the researchers and academicians at the University of Madras. A structured questionnaire was formulated and shared with the study group. The analysis reveals that majority of the study population is unaware of the Social Media Tools (SMTs) promoting scholarly communication such as Bit.ai(53), CiteULike (60), EduGeeksClub (54), Emerald Engage (51), SSRN (51) and use SMTs for recreation and leisure purpose only. The present paper also highlights the major deterrents of using SMTs to share research output. The study finds that though addiction can be a major deterrent to use of social media; it is a viable tool in the present environment which can augment collaboration and contribute to determining quality by measuring the ‘likes, comments and shares’ among the academic and research community.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Al-Aufi, A. S. and Fulton, C. (2014). Use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication in humanities and social sciences disciplines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147: 436-445. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.135.
Ashraf, K. and Mohamed Haneefa, K. (2016). Scholarly use of social media. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(2): 132-139.
Asmi, N. A. and Madhusudhan, M. (2018). Use of social bookmarking sites by research scholars of central universities in north India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 65(2): 105-111.
Bright, J. (2014). The use of Social Media for Research and Analysis: A Feasibility Study. In: Great Britain Department for Work and Pensions (Issue December). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/%0Ahttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/387591/ use-of-social-media-for-research-and-analysis.pdf.
Cann, A, Dimitriou, K., Hooley, T. and Research Information Network (2011). Social Media: A guide for researchers. History, 89: 48. http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/social_media_guide_for_screen.pdf%5Cnhttp:// www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating- research/social-media-guide-researchers.
Factors, D. (2011). A Study on Social Media Networks. Spring, 53(1): 82.
Gu, F. and Widén-Wulff, G. (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study. Electronic Library, 29(6): 762-776. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111187999.
Hobson, J. and Cook, S. (2011). Social media for researchers: Opportunities and challenges. MAI Review, 3(2010): 1-4. http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&A N=76131096&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Mohamed Haneefa, K. and Sumitha, E. (2011). Perception and use of social networking sites by the students of Calicut University. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 31(4): 295-301. https://doi.org/10.14429/ djlit.31.4.1109.
Literacy, I., Platforms, M., Coordinator, S., Coordinator, P., Consultant, I. M., Writer, C. and Reviewer, C. (n.d.). Media and Information Literacy Social Media Platforms and Tools Media and Information Literacy Social Media Platforms and Tools.
Nigam Karnika and Singh M. P. (2016). Impact of social networking sites in scholarly communication by state universities of Uttrakhand. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 36(5): 291−301. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.36.5.10085.
Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S. and Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9): 708-713. https:// doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0334. PMid:23679571 PMCid:PMC3942703.
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N. and Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3): 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306.
Singh, K. P. and Gill, M. S. (2015). Role and users’ approach to social networking sites (SNSs): A study of universities of North India. Electronic Library, 33(1): 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2012-0165.
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V. and Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9): 2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833.
Work, S., Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D. and Larivière, V. (2015). Social Media in Scholarly Communication: A Review of the Literature and Empirical Analysis of Twitter use by SSHRC Doctoral Award Recipients. Study Commissioned by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, 87p. http://crctcs.openum.ca/files/sites/60/2015/12/SSHRC_ SocialMediainScholarlyCommunication.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2022-04-29
Published 2022-04-15
