Study of Variations of Citation-based Parameters for Selected Indian Science Journals

Authors

  • Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Rangamati, Midnapore – 721102, West Bengal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2024/v61i3/171074

Keywords:

Citation Analysis, Garfield Constant, Garfield Ratio, Indian Astronomy Journal, Indian Physics Journal, Informetrics, Scientometrics

Abstract

The ratio of the total number of citations to the total number of cited papers was predicted as a constant by Garfield. But, later he observed the changing nature of this constant over time. Scientometricians called it the ‘Garfield Ratio’ rather than the ‘Garfield Constant’. ‘Garfield Ratio’ is a well-known citation-based parameter that indicates the average citation per cited article. However, Garfield still pointed out that behind this ratio some deeper regularity may be found. In this paper, an analysis of this indicator, the Garfield Ratio (GR)Y is attempted for twelve prominent Indian science journals from 2009 to 2020. Two other formulae for Garfield Ratio are introduced here, i.e. Modified Garfield Ratio for the year ‘Y’ (GRM)Y and Time-Normalised Garfield Ratio for the year ‘Y’ (GRN)Y. The year-wise analysis of these two Garfield Ratios, i.e., (GRM)Y and (GRN)Y for the twelve journals over twelve years is also carried out. The temporal variations of (GR)Y, (GRM)Y and (GRN)Y are interpreted by seven statistical parameters, i.e. mean, median, standard deviation, range, coefficient of variation, skewness and kurtosis. The temporal variations of (GR)Y for twelve journals are viewed by regression analysis to find out the best-fit function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Andreis, M., & Jokic, M. (2008). An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCIexpanded database in time span 1975-2001. Scientometrics, 75(2), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-007-1858-x

Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 93-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410110

Garfield, E. (1977). Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant? Essays of an Information Scientist, 2(4), 419-425. Available at: http://www.garfield. library.upenn.edu/allvols.html

Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology: Its theory and practice. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69-76. https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF02458396

Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3/4). https:// doi.org/10.1300/J010v41n03_01 PMid:16236637

Luukonen-Gronow, T., & Suutarinen, P. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of Nordic cancer research A report on study data. FPR-Publication No. 8. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

Kolasa, W. M. (2012). Specific character of citations in historiography (using the example of Polish history). Scientometrics, 90(3), 905-923. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-011-0553-0 PMid:22347759 PMCid:PMC3271226

Schubert, A., & Schubert, G. (2018). Whatever happened to Garfield’s constant? Scientometrics, 114(2), 659-667. https:// dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1007/s11192-017-2527-3

Umstätter, W., & Hamzeh, A. N. (2006). Über den jährlichen Anstieg des impact factors und der Garfieldschen Konstante. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57(2), 113-118.

Vinkler, P. (2002). Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) factors in practice. Scientometrics, 53(2), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2137-1

Vinkler, P. (2004). Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The Garfield (impact) factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(5), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10391

Vinkler, P. (2009). Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals. Scientometrics, 79(3), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-009-0427-x

Vinkler, P. Introducing the contemporary contribution index for characterizing the recent relevant impact of journals. 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Proceedings of International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Madrid, Spainhttps://www.issi-society.org/ publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-ofissi- 2007/

White, M. J. & White, K. G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32(5), 301- 305. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.32.5.301

White, M. J. (1979). Scholarly impact of New Zealand psychology (1970-1977). New Zealand Psychologist, 8(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1970.10428606

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

Dutta, B. (2024). Study of Variations of Citation-based Parameters for Selected Indian Science Journals. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 61(3), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2024/v61i3/171074

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>