Retracted Publications of India Indexed in Web of Science: An Analytical Study

Dhruvakumar .; M. Chandrashekara

doi:10.17821/srels/2025/v62i1/171532

Authors

Dhruvakumar .
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570005, Karnataka
M. Chandrashekara
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570005, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i1/171532

Keywords:

Research Ethics, Research Misconduct, Retracted Publications, Retraction, Retraction Watch Database

Abstract

The main intent of this study is to comprehensively review the characteristics of retracted Indian research publications indexed in the Web of Science database. The research data covered is for the period from 1989 to 2023, and results reveal that a significant portion of retracted papers was published in Q1 (293, 28.2%) and Q2 (339, 32.62%) ranked journals. Over half of the retracted articles (528 or 50.82%) were published in journals with an impact factor of less than one. Chemistry and computer science are the top two subjects with the highest number of retracted articles. A notable 198 articles were retracted within a year of their publication, closely followed by 177 articles retracted within one to two years. Interestingly, 60 articles were retracted after a decade. Despite this, 1,039 articles got 17,919 citations, with an average of 17.24 citations per article. A total of 4,329 authors contributed 1,039 articles. The majority (929 articles, 89.41%) of the retracted articles were co-authored by two to ten authors and most of the articles (749) were retracted for multiple reasons. 436 articles were retracted due to plagiarism, which encompasses the duplication and plagiarism of articles, data, text, and images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspura, M. Y. I., Noorhidawati, A., & Abrizah, A. (2018). An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes. Scientometrics. 115(3), 1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2720-z

Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to publications. JAMA, 280, 296-297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.296 PMid:9676689

Elango, B. (2021). Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3965-3981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03895-1 PMid:33716353 PMCid:PMC7937359

Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), Article e1001563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563 PMid:24311988 PMCid:PMC3848921

Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 7028-17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109 PMid:23027971 PMCid:PMC3479492

Kali, A., & Srirangaraj, S. (2015). Emerging trends in retraction of publications in PubMed-indexed medical journals. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 58(2), 263-264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.155358 PMid:25885158

Kincaid, E. (2023). Hindawi reveals process for retracting more than 8,000 paper mill articles. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2023/12/19/hindawi-reveals-processforretracting-more-than-8000-paper-mill-articles/

Marco-Cuenca, G., Salvador-Oliván, J. A., & ArqueroAvilés, R. (2021). Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union: An analysis through their retractions.

Scientometrics, 126(6), 5143-5164. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-021-03977

Mukhopadhyay, P., Mukhopadhyay, M., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Retractions in India since independence: A multifaceted analysis for 75 years through data carpentry. Annals of Library and Information Science, 69(4), 304-322. https://10.56042/alis.v69i4.67478

Sara B. Nath, Marcus S. C., & Druss, B. G. (2006). Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes? Medical Journal of Australia, 185(3), 152-154. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00504.x PMid:16893357

Retraction Watch Database. (n.d.). Retraction watch database. http://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx

Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2024). Retrieved March 25, 2024, from https://www.scimagojr.com/.

Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 A new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479-481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8 PMid:38087103

Vuong, Q. H. (2020). The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1282

Wray, K. B., & Andersen, L. E. (2018). Retractions in science. Scientometrics, 117(3). 2009-2019. https://10.1007/s11192-018-2922-4