Evaluation Gap of Internet Banking Service Quality by Using Servqual Approach - an Empirical Study of Indian Banks
Authors
-
B.N. Bahadur Institute of Management Science, DOS in Business Administration, University of Mysore
Poolad Daneshvar -
Kuvempu University, PG Center, Kadur, KarnatakaH.N. Ramesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2010/v47i5/44042Keywords:
Satisfaction, Expectation, Gap Model of Service QualityAbstract
This paper deals with the concept of service quality and has demonstrated the model of service quality gaps; it aims to measure customers‟ gap between satisfaction levels of interpretation of services and their preferences of the interpretive service in internet banking at Indian commercial banks. The research questions are utilized to measure the gap between expectation and satisfaction levels of customers about quality of internet banking. For this purpose a questionnaire with five-point Likert scale is applied to measure customers expectation as well as satisfaction. Data was obtained from 102 respondents and analyzed using SPSS 12 software by employing factor analysis and multiple regressions. Results indicate that there are significant differences between overall expectations and satisfaction levels of customers. For practitioners, it is worth noting that customers are exclusively concerned with the "Sufficient menu for transaction"," Variety of services readily accessible", "Availability for business" and "Have a user-friendly system", as important factors for them to apply internet banking. The paper contains material relevant to the internet banking industry, and Implications are discussed and recommendations are offered for improving Internet banking services.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Avkiran (N K). Developing an instrument to measure customer service quality in branch banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 12(6); 1994; p10-18.
Bansal (H S); Taylor (S). Investigating the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and switching intentions. In Elizabeth, J.W. and Joseph, C.H. (Eds), Developments in Marketing Science, Academy of Marketing Science, Coral Gables, FL, 1997, p304-13.
Bauer (H H); Schmidt. (H M); Falk (T). Measuring the quality of e-banking portals. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 23(2); 2005; p153-75.
Black (N J); Lockett (A); Winklhofer (H); Ennew (C). The Adoption of Internet Financial Services: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. Vol 29(8); 2001; p390-8.
Brown (C). Customer satisfaction, what is it? Quality Times. Vol. 24(12); 1998; p19–24.
Dabholkar (P A); Shepherd (C D); Thorpe (D I). A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing. Vol. 76(2); 2000; p139-73.
Dabholkar (Thorpe ve Rentz). A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol. 24(2); 1996; p3-16.
Dick (A S); Basu (K). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol. 22(2); 1994; p99–113.
Handfield (R B); Pannesi (R T). Antecedents of lead-time competitiveness in make-to-order manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 33(2); 1995; p511–537.
Jones (T); Sasser (W). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 73(6); 1995; p88-99.
Joseph (M); McClure (C); Joseph (B). Service quality in banking sector: the impact of technology on service delivery. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 17(4); 1999; p182–191.
Kessler (E); Chakraborty (A). Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 21(4); 1996; p1143–1191.
Kirti (D); Anil (D). Customer expectations and perceptions across the Indian banking industry and the resultant financial implications. Journal of Services Research. Vol. 9(1); 2009.
Lewis (B R); Mitchell (V W). Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Vol. 8(6); 1990; p11-17.
Liu (C); Arnett (K P). Exploring the factors associated with website success in the context of electronic commerce. Information and Management. Vol. 38(1); 2000; p23–34.
Oliver (R L). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. 1997, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Parasuraman (A); Zeithaml (V); Berry (L L). SERVQUAL: a Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing. Vol. 64(1); 1988; p12-43.
Parasuraman (A); Zeithaml (V A); Berry (L L). Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Review. Vol 32(3); 1991; p39-48.
Perrien (J); Ricard (L). The meaning of a marketing relationship: a pilot study. Industrial Marketing and Management. Vol. 24; 1995; p37-43.
Porter (M E). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. 1985, New York: The Free Press.
Ravi (V); Mahil (C); Vidya Sagar (N). Profiling of internet banking users in India using intelligent techniques. Journal of Services Research. Vol. 6(2); 2007; p61–73.
Ronand (M); Ashill (N J); Shao (J); Carruthers (J). An examination of the relationship between service quality dimensions, overall internet banking service quality and customer satisfaction A New Zealand study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. Vol. 27(1); 2009; p103-126.
Shahin (A). SERVQUAL and Model of Service Quality Gaps: A Framework for Determining and Prioritizing Critical Factors in Delivering Quality Services. 2005.
Siu (N Y); Mou (J C). Measuring Service Quality in Internet Banking: The Case of Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. Vol. 17(4); 2005.
Sohail (M S); Shaikh (N M). Internet banking and quality of service Perspectives from a developing nation in the Middle East. Online Information Review. Vol. 32(1); 2008; p58-72
Storbacka (K); Strandvik (T); Gronroos (C). Managing customer relationships for profit: the dynamics of relationship quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management. Vol 5(5); 1994; p21-38.
Sureshchandar (G S); Rajendran (C); Anantharaman (R N). Customer perceptions of service quality in the banking sector of a developing economy: a critical analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 21(5); 2003; p233-42.
Teas (R K). Expectations, Performance Evaluation, And Consumers Perceptions of Quality. Journal Of Marketing. Vol 57(4); 1993; p18-34.
Thampy (A); Madanmohan (T R). Indian overseas bank: Customer Service Survey. Indian Institute of Managemnet. October 1999.
Thornton (J); White (L). Financial distribution channels: technology versus tradition. Journal of Professional Services Marketing. Vol. 21(2); 2000; p59-74.
Thornton (J); White (L). Customer orientations and usage of financial distribution channels. Journal of Services Marketing. Vol. 15(3); 2001; p168-184.
Vavra (T G). Improving Your Measurement of Customer Satisfaction: A Guide to Creating, Conducting, Analyzing, and Reporting Customer Satisfaction Measurement Programs. 1997, ASQ Quality Press.
Yavas (U); Bilgin (Z); Shemwell (D J). Service quality in the banking sector in an emerging economy: a consumer survey. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 15(6); 1997; p217-23.
Yeung (M); Ging (L); Ennew (C). Customer satisfaction and profitability: a reappraisal of the nature of the relationship. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing. Vol. 11(1); 2002; p24-33.
Zeithaml; Bitner. Service Marketing. 1996, Mcgraw-Hill Publication.
Zeithaml (V A); Bitner (M J). Services Marketing. 2000, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Zhu (F X); Wymer (W Jr); Chen (I). IT-based services and service quality in consumer banking. International Journal of Service Industry Management. Vol. 13(1); 2002; p69-90.
Zineldin (M). Bank-company interactions and relationships: some empirical evidence. International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 13(2); 1995; p30-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2013-12-30
Published 2010-09-10
