Swine Influenza Research Output: a Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2014/v51i1/47191Keywords:
Swine Influenza, Bibliometric, Analysis, MEDLINE, Relative Growth Rate (RGR), Doubling Time (Dt), Degree of CollaborationAbstract
Quantitative analysis is carried out to identify the literature growth, authorship pattern, collaboration and journal distribution on Swine influenza disease research based on data obtained from Pubmed databases for a period from 2006-2010. A total of 2360 articles were downloaded from Pubmed database using the search term "Swine*" subjected to bibliometric data analysis techniques. Findings - A number of research questions pertaining to publication frequency, country, and institution productivity and collaborative were proposed and answered. Analysis shows that majority of the scientists preferred to publish research papers in multiple authorship. It also analyses the characteristics of most productive institutions, languages and journals.Downloads
Metrics
References
Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-29/health/swine.flu_1_swine-flu-first-case-pandemic
Deo, M.G. (2009). Slum-dwellers are relatively resistant to swine flu. Current Science, 97(10):1278.
Reddy, K.S; Sahni, P; Pande, G.K. and Numdy, S. (1991). Research in Indian medical institutes. The National Medical Journal of India, 4:90–92.
Arora, M; Banerjee, J.K.; Sahni, P; Pande, G.K. and Nundy, S. (1996). Which are the best undergraduate medical colleges in India? The National Medical Journal of India, 9: 135–140.
Deo, M.G. (2008). Undergraduate medical students research in India. The Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 54: 176–179.
Satyanarayana, K. Final Report of the project on National Mapping of Science: Biomedical Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.dsir.gov.in/reports/sciento/A-15.pdf
Srivastava, D. and Diwakar, S. (2008). Changing face of Indian Medical Research: A collaboration analysis of papers from SCI (1999 and 2007). In Proceedings of WIS, International Conference on Webometrics, Informatics and Scientometrics, Berlin, Institute for Library and Information Science.
Kundra, R. (1996). Investigation of collaborative research trends in Indian medical sciences, 1900-1945. Scientometrics, 36(1):69–80.
Dutt, B; Kumar, S. and Garg, K.C. (2009). Mapping of Plant-based medical research in China and India. Research Evaluation, 18(1):51–59.
Arunachalam S. (1995). Research if relevance mattered? Medical research in India as reflected in SCI 1981-85. In Proceedings of the 5th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. River Forest, IL, 7-10 June 1995: Illionois, USA, pp. 33–42.
Arunachalam S. (1997). How relevant is research done in India? A study based on MEDLINE. Current Science, 72(12):912–922.
Dandona, L; Sivan, Y.S; Jyothi, M.N; Bhasker, V.S. and Dandona, R. (2004). The lack of public health research output from India. BMC Public Health, 4: 55. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/4/55
Dandona, L; Raban, M.Z; Guggilla, R.K; Bhatnagar, A. and Dandona, R. (2009). Trends of the public health research output from India during 2001-2008. BMC Medicine, 7: 59. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/7/59/
Jain, N.C. (2008). Growing visibility of Indian biomedi¬cine and life science journals in global alerting services. In Proceedings of WIS, Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informatics and Scientometrics. Institute for Library and Information science, Berlin.
Pandya, S. (1990). Why the output of medical research from India is low? BMJ, 301(11):33.
Krishnamurthy, G; Ramakrishnan, J. and Devi, S. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of literature on diabetes (1995–2004). Annals of Library and Information Science, 56(3): 150–155.
Pradhan, Pallab; Panda, Saroj. and Chandrakar, Rajesh (2011). Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in Indian Chemistry literature. In Proceedings 8th International CALIBER, Goa. pp. 691–699.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2014-02-25
Published 2014-02-02