Activity Index and Lotka's Law Application with Diabetes and Allied Diseases in India During 1995–2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2015/v52i6/84320Keywords:
Activity Index, Bibliometrics, Doubling Time, Lotka's Law, Relative Growth Rate, Science Production Index, Scientometrics.Abstract
This paper describes the relative growth rate and doubling time and activity index and Lotka's law apply on the publications of diabetes and allied diseases during 1995-2013. The study found that steady growth rate in terms of productivity was observed throughout the period of study. There was a sudden increase noticed in 2002, 2009, and 2012 while a declining trend was observed in 1996, 2003, and 2013. The calculated values of Maximum Likelihood Estimator, n and k are 0.24, 2.66 and 0.78 respectively. The C.V. at 0.05 significant level for 29 degrees of freedom is 42.56 and the calculated value of Chi-Square (X2) obtained in this case is 5309.368. Afterwords, the performance of researchers started diminishing. It was supported by SPI that ranges between 9 and 10 only.Downloads
Metrics
References
Price, D.D.S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press. New York.
Dolrov, G.H. and Korennoi, A.A. (1969). The informational basis of scientometrics: on theoretical problems of informetrics. F.I.D.435 p.16-191.
Tombazos (2005). Ranking of Spanish Universities in Article Publications. Scientometrics, 69:141-154.
Sharma, K.M. (2009). Research publication trend among scientists of Central Potato Research Institute: A bibliometrics study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 56:29-34.4
Velloso, A.; Lannes, D. and Leopoldo, De Meis (2004). Concentration of Science in Brazilian Governmental Universities. Scientometrics, 61(2):207-220.
Krishnamoorthy, G. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of literature on diabetes. Annals of library and information studies, 56: 150-155.
Sevukan, R. (2008). Bibliometrics analysis of research output of biotechnology faculties in some Indian central universities. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information technology, 28(6):11-20.
Garg, K.C., a n d Padhi, P. (2001). A Study of Collaboration in Laser Science and Technology. Scientometrics, 51(3): 415-427.
Ramesh Babu, D.B. and Ramakrishnan, J. (2007). Indian Contributions to the Field of Hepatitis (1984-2003):A Scientometric Study. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, Scientometrics (ed. by Divya Srivastava, Ramesh Kundra and Hildrun Kretshmer). p. 22-31.
Baskrarn, C. (2013). Research productivity of of Alagappa University during 1999-2011: a bibliometric study. DESIDOC Journal of library and Information Tachnology, 33(3):236-242.
Baskaran, C. and Sivakami, N. (2014). Swine influenza research output: a bibliometric analysis. SERLS Journal of Information Management, 51(1).
Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of Scientific Literature. Proceedings of the 1515 IASLIC Conference: Bangalore.
Frame, J.D. (1997). Mainstream Research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2:143-148.
Yueh, Ming, Jou, Shiow-Jem and Ma, Sheau-Shin (2000). Bibliometric Study of Semiconductor Literature, 1978-1997. Scientometrics, 49: 491-509.
Kawamura, M. et al. (1999). Lotka's Law and the Pattern of Scientific Productivity in the Dental Science Literature. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 24(4):309-315.
Lotka, A.J. (1926). The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16:317-323.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Accepted 2015-12-07
Published 2015-12-01