Specialist Library <I>versus</I> Generalist Library: Document Selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/1968/v5i2/49193Abstract
This is a report of three classes in DRTC, extending over five hours, conducted by Dr Ranganathan, on 21, 22, and 23 March 1967. Singles out the techniques distinctive to a Specialist Library from that of a Generalist Library, on the basis of the Five Laws of Library Science. They are: Individual approach to ascertain specialist interest as against statistical approach in a Generalist Library (Law 1); Informal talks with each specialist as against mass survey (Law 2); Restricting the acquisition of periodicals to those having at least 40 per cent of their articles relevant to the subject-interest of a Specialist Library (Law 3); Coordination in acquisition of periodicals and cooperation among libraries (Law 2 and 3); Acquisition of indexing periodicals, abstracting periodicals, trend reports, short communication periodicals, and preview type periodicals (Law 4); and Drastic weeding out of obsolete documents in a Specialist Library (Law 5). The usual annotations highlighting the educational principles followed in the class are added.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1968-06-05
How to Cite
Ranganathan, S. R., & Gopinath, M. A. (1968). Specialist Library <I>versus</I> Generalist Library: Document Selection. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 5(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/1968/v5i2/49193
Issue
Section
Articles
License
All the articles published in Journal of Information and Knowledge are held by the Publisher. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (SRELS), as a publisher requires its authors to transfer the copyright prior to publication. This will permit SRELS to reproduce, publish, distribute and archive the article in print and electronic form and also to defend against any improper use of the article.
Received 2014-05-22
Accepted 2014-05-22
Published 1968-06-05
Accepted 2014-05-22
Published 1968-06-05