Digital Preservation: a Paradox or Sophism?

Authors

  • University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, P. O. Box-230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2012/v49i5/43842

Keywords:

Archiving, Data, Digital Libraries, Digital Preservation, Metadata

Abstract

Preservation of traditional materials became more successful and systematic after libraries and archives integrated preservation into overall planning and resource allocation. Digital preservation is largely experimental and replete with the risks associated with untested methods. Digital preservation strategies are shaped by the needs and constraints of repositories with little consideration for the requirements of current and future users of digital scholarly resources. The article discusses the present state of digital preservation and the contradiction where we want to maintain digital information intact, but we also want to access this information in a dynamic use context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burwer (G T). Electronic Systems and Records Management in the Information Age. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 23; 1997; p47-52.

Conway (Paul). Digitizing Preservation. Library Journal. Vol. 12; 1994; p42–45.

Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future, PITAC (President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee) Report (1999). National Coordination office for CIC, http://www.ccic.gov/ac/.

Lynch (Clifford). The Integrity of Digital Information: Mechanics and Definitional Issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 45; 1994; p737–744.

Levy (David M); Catherine (C Marshall). Going Digital: A Look at Assumptions Underlying Digital Libraries. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 58; 1995; p77–84.

Rothenberg (Jeff). Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Documents. Scientific American. Vol. 272; 1995; p24–29.

How to Cite

Ghani, S. R. (2013). Digital Preservation: a Paradox or Sophism?. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 49(5), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2012/v49i5/43842

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2013-12-26
Accepted 2013-12-26